Do Leaves Curl Up And Die?

Do Leaves Curl Up And Die?

Understanding Biological Life Versus Biblical Life

Bodie Hodge, M.Sc., B.Sc., PEI

Biblical Authority Ministries, November 5, 2026 (Donate)

Well, its that time of year again when leaves rustle across the road and drop in yards and forests. There is a beauty about Fall that is both striking and sad. Vibrant trees begin dropping their leaves and they whither and change into striking colors—depending on the type of tree.

Fall Colors! Photo by Bodie Hodge

Yet the tree endures Winter and returns in the Spring with buds, growth, flowers, fruits and nuts, and of course, new leaves.

But an interesting question arises from Christian theology. Before Adam and Eve sinned, there was no death. Death is the punishment for sin (Genesis 2:17). Yet prior to the Fall into sin in Genesis 3, man ate from trees and animals fed on green herbs (Genesis 1:29-30).

So was this a type of death before sin? Were leaves that were eaten “dying” for instance?

Are Plants Alive In A Biblical Sense?

Modern biology classifies plants as living organisms because they grow, reproduce, metabolize nutrients, respond to stimuli, and contain cells. Consequently, when a leaf falls from a tree, dries up, and decomposes, scientists often describe it as dying.

However, does the Bible classify plants as living creatures in the same modern biological sense as humans and animals?

Genesis 1:11-12 records God creating vegetation, including grass, herbs, and fruit trees, on Day Three of Creation Week. Yet Scripture distinguishes plants from creatures described as having life in the sense of nephesh chayyah, often translated as “living soul”, "living creature", or "living being."

This distinction is significant when understanding the original creation, the Fall, and the entrance of death into the world. From a biblical sense, plants and leaves are not considered living…so they can’t die.

The Bible consistently uses terms like wither, which helps us understand the difference (e.g., Psalm 37:2, 102:11; Isaiah 19:6, Jeremiah 12:4). God’s Word describes plants as withering or fading (Isaiah 40:6-8), although Job 14:7-12 also uses death language when contrasting a tree with a human being—but that is clear metaphorical sense, not a narrative so as to define life. 

What Is Nephesh Chayyah?

The Hebrew expression nephesh chayyah refers to a living creature or living being. It appears in Genesis 1:20-21, 24 and Genesis 2:19 in connection with animals and man. Genesis 2:7 also describes Adam becoming a living being. Man is unique of course having a living soul that is made in the image of an eternal God giving us an eternal value different from animals (Genesis 1:26-27).

Plants, however, are never explicitly called nephesh chayyah in the creation account. Or elsewhere for that matter! This distinction helps explain how plants could be eaten before Adam sinned without contradicting the original creation's goodness.

Genesis 1:29-30 establishes that God originally provided vegetation for the purpose of feeding humans and animals. Eating fruit, seeds, or leaves would involve the consumption of plant material, but not necessarily the death of a nephesh chayyah creature.

In other words, plants are like solar powered, self-replicating biological machines that provide several functions. They provide food sources, clean the air while replenishing oxygen in the atmosphere, clean water sources, nitrogenize soil, recycle nutrients, provide fuel (burning for instance), medicinal uses, shade, lumber, and general beauty. And I probably missed some.  

Do Leaves Actually Die?

It depends on the definition! Biologically, yes. Leaves contain living cells that eventually cease functioning. During autumn, many deciduous trees like here in Kentucky withdraw nutrients from their leaves, chlorophyll breaks down, and the leaves eventually separate from the branches.

However, a leaf dying biologically isn’t the equivalent to the biblical death associated with the Fall. By biblical definition, then…no, leaves don’t actually die, but whither or fade.

Romans 5:12 explains that sin entered the world through Adam and death through sin. The passage concerns human death, while the broader effects of the Fall are understood to include animal suffering and death.

Thus, leaves could fall, fruit could be eaten, and vegetation could be consumed before Adam's sin without requiring the death of humans or animals—which are defined as living creatures.

Conclusion

We need to remember that there is a distinction between biological life and biblical nephesh life. This helps explain why eating vegetation before the Fall doesn’t contradict Genesis 1:31, where God declared His creation "very good" or Deuteronomy 32:4 where every work of God is perfect (e.g., the work of Creation Week)

Plants were designed by God to provide nourishment, oxygen, and environmental recycling without the death of nephesh chayyah creatures. After the fall, even plants were affected (thorns, thistles, not all fruit can be eaten but some are rendered as poisonous). Regardless, a fallen leaf may be biologically dead, but its death isn’t equivalent to the death of a human or animal by a biblical standard.

The biblical distinction should reminds us that Adam's sin brought a terrible consequence into creation, while the good news of Jesus Christ offers victory over death (1 Corinthians 15:21-22). 

□

Bodie Hodge, Ken Ham's son in law, has been an apologist defending 6-day creation and opposing evolution since 1998. He spent 21 years working at Answers in Genesis as a speaker, writer, and researcher as well as a founding news anchor for Answers News. He was also head of the Oversight Council.  

Bodie launched Biblical Authority Ministries in 2015 as a personal website and it was organized officially in 2025 as a 501(c)(3). He has spoken on multiple continents and hosts of US states in churches, colleges, and universities. He is married with four children.

Mr. Hodge earned a Bachelor and Master of Science degrees from Southern Illinois University at Carbondale (SIUC). Then he taught at SIUC for a couple of years as a Visiting Instructor teaching all levels of undergraduate engineering and running a materials lab and a CAD lab. He did research on advanced ceramic materials to develop a new method of production of titanium diboride with a grant from Lockheed Martin. He worked as a Test Engineer for Caterpillar, Inc., prior to entering full-time ministry.

His love of science was coupled with a love of history, philosophy, and theology. For about one year of his life, Bodie was editing and updating a theological, historical, and scientific dictionary/encyclopedia. Mr. Hodge has over 25 years of experience in writing, speaking and researching in these fields.

Allhallowtide: All Hallows' Eve, All Saints' Day, All Souls' Day, (and Reformation Day)

Allhallowtide: All Hallows' Eve, All Saints' Day, All Souls' Day, (And Reformation Day)

Bodie Hodge, M.Sc., B.Sc., PEI

Biblical Authority Ministries, November 2, 2026 (Donate)

In Medieval times, All Saints Day was like Christmas is today! It was huge. Today, most people have forgotten All Saints Day or the three-day festival surrounding it. Throughout Christian history, several observances have developed around October 31 through November 2.

Although these days are associated with Christianity, their origins, purposes, and practices differ considerably. Let’s look more closely at these days.

Image requested by Bodie Hodge*

All Hallows' Eve (October 31)

All Hallows' Eve, commonly called Hallow’een or Halloween, occurs on October 31, the evening before All Saints' Day. The word "hallow" is an older English term meaning "holy" or "saint." Thus, All Hallows' Eve literally means the evening before All Saints' Day. It’s kind of like the way Christmas Eve is to Christmas.

Over time, various European folk customs from the Day of the Dead which was also October 31-November 1 (more on this in a moment) became associated with the evening, including costumes, bonfires, and traditions concerning death and spirits. Some customs have been linked to pre-Christian (anti-Christian) festivals such as Samhain, although the historical connections are still debated.

Today, Halloween is largely celebrated as a non-Christian “holiday” in many Western countries, often with activities that differ considerably from its Christian liturgical origins.

All Saints' Day (November 1)

All Saints' Day, also called All Hallows' Day, honors Christians who have died, particularly those recognized as saints. This observance developed in the early church, with November 1 becoming established in Western Christianity during the early medieval period.

It’s really a day to observe and remember faithful Christians current and in some sense throughout history. From a biblical perspective, the New Testament frequently refers to living believers as "saints" (Romans 1:7; 1 Corinthians 1:2; Ephesians 1:1). Thus, sainthood wasn’t limited to a special class of Christians or those who have died.

All Souls' Day (November 2)

All Souls' Day is observed primarily to remember the faithful departed. One this day, Roman Catholics spend a lot of time praying for those in “purgatory”, while Christians largely reject this practice as unbiblical  

Protestants rightly reject this practice, and we point out that Scripture doesn’t establish purgatory or instruct Christians to pray for the dead—instead pray to God alone! Hebrews 9:27 shows that judgment follows death, while Hebrews 10:14 reveals the sufficiency of Christ's sacrifice for those of us being sanctified in our holiness. Together, October 31 through November 2 are sometimes called Allhallowtide.

Reformation Day (October 31)

Reformation Day commemorates the beginning of the Protestant Reformation, traditionally dated to October 31, 1517, when Martin Luther’s Ninety-Five Theses were nailed to the door of the church in Wittenberg, Germany.

Luther challenged the sale and misuse of indulgences, challenged purgatory biblically, both of which were associated with the remission of temporal punishment for sins, including punishment that supposedly remain after death.

Why October 31?

Luther's choice of October 31 was chosen because the following day was All Saints' Day. Everyone would see it coming to church—the biggest festival of the times! Wittenberg's Castle Church housed an extensive collection of relics, which attracted pilgrims seeking indulgences associated with their veneration.

By circulating his theses immediately before All Saints' Day, Luther addressed practices particularly relevant to the approaching celebration. Whether he physically nailed the theses to the church door remains historically debated—but they made their way there nonetheless.

The Reformation is a time to remember the Five Solas and mainly that salvation by grace through faith in Jesus Christ. It also is a reminder of the authority of Scripture, and the sufficiency of Christ's atoning work.

Samhain: The Celtic Day Of The Dead And Its Relationship To Christian Holidays

Samhain (pronounced "SOW-in") was an ancient Celtic festival that was basically their Day of the Dead (Mexico and many others also have a Day of the Dead, Ghost Festival, Obon, etc.). And it was traditionally observed around October 31 or November 1. It was particularly associated with Ireland, Scotland, and other Celtic regions of the Northwest part of Europe.

Samhain was their celebration of the boundary between the living and the dead. Traditions included lighting bonfires, communal gatherings, sacrifice (even human sacrifices), and beliefs concerning spirits or supernatural beings. Some later customs involved disguises and offerings intended to appease or discourage wandering spirits.

As Christianity spread into these regions and enlightened them, Christian observances and existing folk traditions increasingly interacted and essentially mixed or syncretized. All Saints' Day (November 1) and All Souls' Day (November 2) eventually became associated with the same seasonal period—and naturally Halloween still retains a reflection of all that.

All Hallows' Eve (October 31) subsequently became associated with mixed-pagan customs that reflected both Christian traditions and older European paganism of the early Celts. Some Halloween practices might even have connections to Samhain, although their precise origins are uncertain due to the lack of documentation.[1]

As a point of clarification, Reformation Day (October 31, 1517) was unrelated to Samhain though. Martin Luther's Ninety-Five Theses addressed indulgences and unbiblical church practices and had its largest reach the day before All Saints' Day.

Conclusion

All Hallows' Eve, All Saints' Day, and All Souls' Day were based on Christian traditions about saints, death, and remembrance. Reformation Day, however, is about challenging unbiblical ideas and practices that crept into the church and how to remedy it.

For Protestant Christians, October 31 is a great reminder of the importance of returning to Scripture and knowing of Christ's finished work as sufficient for salvation (Ephesians 2:8-9; 2 Timothy 3:16-17).

□

Bodie Hodge, Ken Ham's son in law, has been an apologist defending 6-day creation and opposing evolution since 1998. He spent 21 years working at Answers in Genesis as a speaker, writer, and researcher as well as a founding news anchor for Answers News. He was also head of the Oversight Council.  

Bodie launched Biblical Authority Ministries in 2015 as a personal website and it was organized officially in 2025 as a 501(c)(3). He has spoken on multiple continents and hosts of US states in churches, colleges, and universities. He is married with four children.

Mr. Hodge earned a Bachelor and Master of Science degrees from Southern Illinois University at Carbondale (SIUC). Then he taught at SIUC for a couple of years as a Visiting Instructor teaching all levels of undergraduate engineering and running a materials lab and a CAD lab. He did research on advanced ceramic materials to develop a new method of production of titanium diboride with a grant from Lockheed Martin. He worked as a Test Engineer for Caterpillar, Inc., prior to entering full-time ministry.

His love of science was coupled with a love of history, philosophy, and theology. For about one year of his life, Bodie was editing and updating a theological, historical, and scientific dictionary/encyclopedia. Mr. Hodge has over 25 years of experience in writing, speaking and researching in these fields.

*Image by generative program as requested by Bodie Hodge

 

---

[1] Most of what we know about Samhain was recorded by the Romans who interacted with them.

What About The Suffering Of Jesus Christ On The Cross From A Biological Perspective

What About The Suffering Of Jesus Christ On The Cross From A Biological Perspective?

Bodie Hodge, M.Sc., B.Sc., PEI

Biblical Authority Ministries, October 29, 2026 (Donate)

The crucifixion of Jesus Christ was among the most agonizing forms of execution in the ancient world. Beyond its spiritual significance, Christ was tortured with extraordinary physical suffering by the hand of the Romans. Many medical personnel have examined the anatomy and physiology of crucifixion to help Christians better understand what Jesus experienced.

Dried blood on used cross; Image requested by Bodie Hodge*

Doctors And Biologists

A number of biological and medical personnel have studied and published on this subject over the years. Back in 1965, Dr. C Truman Davis wrote about Christ’s sufferings on the Cross. He discussed the physical trauma and physiological effects.

Severe Physical Trauma And Blood Loss

Davis, who was a physician, analyzed the tremendous physical suffering Jesus experienced before His crucifixion. That was bad enough! Roman scourging could produce deep lacerations, massive blood loss, and potentially hypovolemic shock (this is a type of shock resulting from reduced blood volume).[1]

Davis made the point that Jesus was already severely weakened before being nailed to the Cross. His analysis of the trauma helps us understand Christ's exhaustion and inability to continue carrying His cross, as well as why He died earlier than the thieves who were crucified with Him (Matthew 27:32).[2] Jesus' weakened physical condition surely helps explain why Simon of Cyrene was compelled to carry His cross (Luke 23:26).

The Physiological Effects Of Crucifixion

Davis also proposed that the crucifixion produced a type of progressive respiratory distress. With the arms extended and the body suspended, breathing became increasingly difficult. The victim would need to push upward with his feet to exhale effectively, producing excruciating pain. Keep in mind that the nail through the feet is going through the nerves of the foot. This maximizes pain by the Romans. Davis suggests that exhaustion, respiratory impairment, and cardiovascular collapse were all factors that likely contributed to Jesus' physical death.[3]

Another journal article was written by a group of medical professionals in 1986.[4] It was published in Journal of the American Medical Association by Dr. William D. Edwards et al. In this article they discuss a number of medical factors that were likely at play as well as the placement of the spear at the end.

Shock And Respiratory Failure

The authors of this journal article concluded that Jesus likely died from a combination of severe blood loss, hypovolemic shock, and exhaustion asphyxia. As mentioned before, scourging caused extensive tissue damage, while the crucifixion progressively impaired breathing. They also considered acute heart failure as a possible contributing factor. Their science-based analysis led them to believe that several physiological things were probably happening at once that contributed to Christ's death rather than one isolated injury.[5]

Medical Evidence Confirming Jesus' Death

The researchers also examined the Roman soldier's spear thrust into Jesus' side (John 19:34). They proposed that the spear probably penetrated the right lung, pericardium, and possibly the heart. Roman soldiers weren’t ignorant. The person stabbing was surely aiming for the heart. The reported discharge of blood and water is consistent with fluid surrounding the lungs or heart. The medical researchers, like the Roman soldiers, concluded that Jesus was unquestionably dead when removed from the cross, contradicting make-believe stories that He merely survived crucifixion.[6]

Now, let’s look closer at some of these aspects.

The Agony in Gethsemane

Jesus' suffering began before His crucifixion. Luke 22:44 describes His intense agony in Gethsemane, where His sweat became like great drops of blood.

Some medical researchers associate this description with hematidrosis, a rare condition in which extreme stress causes blood to enter the sweat. A late friend, Dr. Tommy Mitchell noted that this condition could make the skin exceptionally sensitive, potentially intensifying the pain of subsequent beatings and scourging.[7]

Scourging And Tissue Damage

Following His arrest, Jesus was beaten, scourged, and crowned with thorns (Matthew 27:26-30). Roman scourging could tear through skin, damage underlying muscles, expose nerves, and rupture blood vessels. Such injuries could produce substantial blood loss, inflammation, and extreme pain.

Dr. Mitchell also observed that the scarlet robe placed upon Jesus' injured back (Matthew 27:28) could have adhered to damaged tissues. When removed, it may have reopened wounds, causing additional bleeding.[8]

The crown of thorns would’ve punctured the scalp, which contains numerous blood vessels and nerves. This would also produce a lot bleeding as well as intense pain.

Blood Loss And Hypovolemic Shock

Blood carries oxygen and nutrients throughout the body. Severe blood loss reduces circulating blood volume, potentially producing the hypovolemic shock that was already mentioned. As blood pressure then falls, the heart beats faster to compensate. Circulation becomes increasingly inadequate, depriving organs of oxygen. This strains the body’s organs in hosts of ways and can lead to organ failure after some time.

The Nails And Nervous System

The nails driven through Christ's hands and feet no doubt caused intense pain. Although Scripture identifies the hands and feet, it doesn’t specify the exact placement of the nails. But there are obvious places to put them from the Roman’s experience. To maximize pain, and not break bones, at the base of the hands where the nerve is and the nerve collection in the feet—this is was makes every part of the body feel the excruciating pain from the moment the nails pierce Him.

Anatomically, nails passing through the base of the hand/wrist region or base of the palm would damage or compress the median nerve, producing severe pain that would radiate into the fingers and the length of the arms. This is the same nerve that triggers your funny bone further up on His arm.

In the same fashion, nails penetrating the feet could injure nerves and surrounding tissues, making every attempt to support His body extremely painful.

Muscle Fatigue And Cramping

Suspended by His outstretched arms, Jesus would have experienced enormous strain on His shoulders, chest, arms, and back too.

Muscles forced to remain under tension become fatigued and this also causes extreme pain. This slows down the oxygen delivery as well. And prolonged exertion can also contribute to cramping and muscular exhaustion. Bear in mind too that His previously scourged back would also have rubbed against the wooden cross whenever He moved.

Difficulty Breathing

Crucifixion obviously interferes with normal breathing. With the arms extended and the body suspended, the chest wall is very restricted, making breathing more and more difficult. Dr. Mitchell points out that the position of the body would make it difficult to exhale.[9] To breathe more effectively, a crucified person might push upward against the nails in the feet, relieving some pressure on the chest, but at a cost of intense nerve pain! Can you see why people didn’t want to cross Rome?

Back to the subject at hand, this movement would produce also cause muscular fatigue. As exhaustion progressed, breathing could become increasingly shallow, potentially contributing to respiratory failure too.

Dehydration And Physiological Stress

Jesus declared that He was thirsty (John 19:28). Blood loss, sweating, exposure, and the absence of fluids produces cardiovascular (heart) strain, and makes you exceptionally weak.

A lack of oxygen compounds this. Dr. Mitchell also suggested metabolic acidosis, which is a dangerous buildup of acids associated with inadequate tissue oxygenation.[10]

The Heart And Circulatory System

So considering the combination of blood loss, trauma, respiratory distress, and extreme physiological stress puts tremendous demands upon the heart. It could cause cardiac arrhythmias, circulatory collapse, and shock.

After Jesus died, a Roman soldier pierced His side, producing a flow of blood and water (John 19:34). Dr. Mitchell suggested that the watery fluid could have originated from a pleural effusion (fluid surrounding the lungs) or pericardial effusion (fluid surrounding the heart).[11] These medical conditions are ripe based on the description we read in the Gospel accounts. Can we be certain? No, but they are consistent.

What Ultimately Caused Christ's Death?

Medical researchers have proposed several possible mechanisms, including shock, respiratory failure, and cardiac complications. These processes could obviously been in conjunction with one another.  Nevertheless, Scripture points to something beyond the biological mechanisms.

The punishment for sin is death. Jesus was not a sinner—so technically, He shouldn’t have been able to die—suffer yes, but die, no. Yet Jesus took on our sin and died in our place (2 Corinthians 5:21). So the real punishment came from God the father who enacted the infinite and eternal judgment on Him.

Image requested by Bodie Hodge*

And this is where it gets powerful. John 19:30 records that Jesus gave up His spirit. Even with all this pain and the excruciating method of the cross, the beatings, the flogging, the crown of thorns, etc., Jesus still had the power to give up His spirit. John 10:18 proves that Christ willingly laid down His life. His death was neither accidental nor a defeat.

In His eternal and infinite nature, Christ bore the full wrath of our sin upon Himself at the Cross. The awe when you think about it. But Christ rose despite all that—showing a power beyond comprehension. He is the risen God.

Conclusion

Medical examinations of crucifixion can help us understand much of what was going on during the crucifixion. We can read about the extraordinary suffering Christ willingly endured. His nervous, muscular, respiratory, and cardiovascular systems would’ve experienced tremendous physical and mental stress.

Yet the significance of the Cross extends beyond biology. Jesus, the sinless Son of God, willingly suffered and died as the substitutionary sacrifice for us (Isaiah 53:5-6; 1 Peter 3:18). His suffering reveals the terrible consequences of sin going back to first sin in the Garden of Eden, while His resurrection proves His victory over death (1 Corinthians 15:54-57).

□

Bodie Hodge, Ken Ham's son in law, has been an apologist defending 6-day creation and opposing evolution since 1998. He spent 21 years working at Answers in Genesis as a speaker, writer, and researcher as well as a founding news anchor for Answers News. He was also head of the Oversight Council.  

Bodie launched Biblical Authority Ministries in 2015 as a personal website and it was organized officially in 2025 as a 501(c)(3). He has spoken on multiple continents and hosts of US states in churches, colleges, and universities. He is married with four children.

Mr. Hodge earned a Bachelor and Master of Science degrees from Southern Illinois University at Carbondale (SIUC). Then he taught at SIUC for a couple of years as a Visiting Instructor teaching all levels of undergraduate engineering and running a materials lab and a CAD lab. He did research on advanced ceramic materials to develop a new method of production of titanium diboride with a grant from Lockheed Martin. He worked as a Test Engineer for Caterpillar, Inc., prior to entering full-time ministry.

His love of science was coupled with a love of history, philosophy, and theology. For about one year of his life, Bodie was editing and updating a theological, historical, and scientific dictionary/encyclopedia. Mr. Hodge has over 25 years of experience in writing, speaking and researching in these fields.

*Image by generative program as requested by Bodie Hodge

---

[1] C. Truman Davis, "The Crucifixion of Jesus" (1965), Arizona Medicine 22, no. 3 (1965): 183-187.

[2] Ibid.

[3] Ibid.

[4] William D. Edwards, Wesley J. Gabel, and Floyd E. Hosmer, "On the Physical Death of Jesus Christ" (1986) Journal of the American Medical Association 255, no. 11 (1986): 1455-1463.

[5] Ibid.

[6] Ibid.

[7] Tommy Mitchell, Our Suffering Savior: A Physician's Perspective, Answers in Genesis, April 1, 2009, https://answersingenesis.org/jesus/crucifixion/our-suffering-savior/.

[8] Ibid.

[9] Ibid.

[10] Ibid.

[11] Ibid.

What About The Shroud Of Turin?

What About The Shroud Of Turin?

Bodie Hodge, M.Sc., B.Sc., PEI

Biblical Authority Ministries, October 27, 2026 (Donate)

When discussing the resurrection, the Shroud of Turin often comes up (and I’ve commented on this before).[1] The arguments I made then still echo powerfully today. 

The Shroud of Turin is no doubt a remarkable linen cloth measuring approximately 14.3 feet long and 3.7 feet wide. However, linking it to grave of Christ does have its problems. First, it appeared in documented history in medieval France in AD 1357, it is now housed in Turin, Italy. 

The cloth contains a mysterious negative image resembling a dead man, perhaps even crucified. Some arbitrarily believe this was Jesus Christ and that the image formed miraculously during His resurrection. In fact, this is the teaching of the Roman Catholic Church as they have venerated the Shroud as a holy relic. 

 

Full length Shroud of Turin, Giuseppe Enrie, 1931, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Despite extensive scientific investigations, including controversial carbon-14 dating and other analyses, questions remain concerning its authenticity. But before accepting the Shroud as Christ's burial cloth, we should examine what Scripture actually says.

Was Jesus Wrapped In A Single Linen Cloth?

Matthew 27:59, Mark 15:46, and Luke 23:53 describe Joseph of Arimathea taking Jesus' body from the Cross and wrapping it in linen. The Greek word sindon refers to a linen cloth.

Christ's body had suffered tremendously from scourging, the crown of thorns, beatings, mental anguish, the crucifixion, and the spear wound (Matthew 27:26-29; John 19:34). Consequently, this initial linen would likely have absorbed considerable blood. And a cloth like this would therefore be used for initial cleaning and transporting the body. Then more linens, rags, towels, and washcloths would be used for further cleaning before applying spices and strips of linen for wrapping the body and its appendages.  

So was this same bloody cloth re-used for His burial? It would violate cleanliness laws of the Old Testament if they did! Nevertheless, the Holy Spirit through the Apostle John provides additional details that the other Gospel writers merely summarize.

What Does John Reveal About Christ's Burial?

John 19:38-42 records that Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus prepared Jesus' body for burial. Nicodemus brought approximately 75 pounds of myrrh and aloes, and they wrapped Christ's body in linen cloths (e.g., strips) with the spices, according to Jewish burial customs.

In parallel, Lazarus had been buried similarly, with his hands and feet bound in grave clothes and a cloth around his face (John 11:43-44). Applying these spices means that the initial bloodied linen was indeed removed. There is no biblical indication that this cloth was reused. Instead, the account says it used strips of burial linens and spices.

John 20:3-7 describes what Peter and John discovered after the Resurrection: linen strips or cloths (othonia) lying in the tomb and a separate cloth that had covered Jesus' head. Luke 24:12 also mentions the linen cloths but none mention an additional large shroud.

Some defenders of the Shroud argue that othonia encompasses all burial cloths, including a large shroud. However, John distinguishes the linen cloths from the separate facial covering—thus scripturally, it doesn’t include all burial cloths. Neither account explicitly identifies another large cloth.

Therefore, the Bible provides no clear evidence that a large, single-piece shroud remained around Christ's body in the tomb. We can ascertain from God’s Word that there was a large linen when He was taken off  the Cross, but not in the grave.

Could The Shroud Have Been The One Used At The Cross?

Some have pondered if perhaps the Shroud of Turin was the initial linen used when Joseph removed Christ's body from the Cross rather than His final burial covering. 

This could explain why the Shroud isn’t identified among the burial linens. Furthermore, the reported absence of substantial burial-spice residue could be consistent with a cloth removed before Nicodemus applied the spices.

However, this is still problematic. First, the notable feature in the now bloody linen when Christ was taken off the Cross is…blood. Yet that doesn’t match the Shroud of Turin. Nor would cleaning His bloody body yield the image impressed on the Shroud.  

Nevertheless, equating the Shroud of Turin with the removal linen is simply blind speculation. Scripture doesn’t tell us what happened to the original linen. Nor can we establish that the Turin cloth was ever associated with Jesus.

Conclusion

The Shroud of Turin is unquestionably an intriguing historical artifact worthy of investigation. However, its documented medieval appearance and uncertain history warrant caution. We need to keep in mind that the brilliance of man and our ancient technology and skills often surprise us today. Could this have been made as a decorative piece for an ancient church to remind congregants what Christ suffered for us? The possibilities are likely numerous for how and what this linen was made. 

Biblically, the strongest argument against this being the burial cloth of Christ is the distinction between the initial linen used at the Cross and the burial linens described by John. Could the Shroud have been that initial cleaning cloth? It's rather doubtful. Was it one of the burial cloths present during the Resurrection? Scripture provides no compelling reason to conclude so.

Christians should avoid imposing interpretations of artifacts upon God's Word (2 Timothy 2:15). Our confidence in Christ's death and bodily resurrection rests upon the authority of Scripture, not the authenticity of a disputed relic.

As 1 Thessalonians 5:21 reminds us, we should test all things and hold fast to what is good. And as for the things that aren’t so good, take them as a grain of salt at best. 

□

Bodie Hodge, Ken Ham's son in law, has been an apologist defending 6-day creation and opposing evolution since 1998. He spent 21 years working at Answers in Genesis as a speaker, writer, and researcher as well as a founding news anchor for Answers News. He was also head of the Oversight Council.  

Bodie launched Biblical Authority Ministries in 2015 as a personal website and it was organized officially in 2025 as a 501(c)(3). He has spoken on multiple continents and hosts of US states in churches, colleges, and universities. He is married with four children.

Mr. Hodge earned a Bachelor and Master of Science degrees from Southern Illinois University at Carbondale (SIUC). Then he taught at SIUC for a couple of years as a Visiting Instructor teaching all levels of undergraduate engineering and running a materials lab and a CAD lab. He did research on advanced ceramic materials to develop a new method of production of titanium diboride with a grant from Lockheed Martin. He worked as a Test Engineer for Caterpillar, Inc., prior to entering full-time ministry.

His love of science was coupled with a love of history, philosophy, and theology. For about one year of his life, Bodie was editing and updating a theological, historical, and scientific dictionary/encyclopedia. Mr. Hodge has over 25 years of experience in writing, speaking and researching in these fields.

---

[1] Bodie Hodge, Shroud Of Turin: Was It In The Grave With Christ?, Biblical Authority Ministries, June 20, 2025, https://www.biblicalauthorityministries.org/2025/06/shroud-of-turin-was-it-in-grave-with.html.