Friday, August 21, 2026

Did It Rain Before The Flood?

 Did It Rain Before The Flood?

Bodie Hodge, M.Sc., B.Sc., PEI

Biblical Authority Ministries, August 21, 2026 (Donate)

An all-to-often Christian teaching is that rain didn’t occur until Noah's Flood. However, a careful reading of the Bible doesn’t actually say this. I humbly suggest that Christians be careful about against being dogmatic about a "no rain before the Flood" position.

A Kentucky rainbow reminder; Photo by Bodie Hodge

What About Genesis 2:5-6?

The main passage used to argue against pre-Flood rain is Genesis 2:5-6 (NKJV):

…before any plant of the field was in the earth and before any herb of the field had grown. For the LORD God had not caused it to rain on the earth, and there was no man to till the ground; but a mist went up from the earth and watered the whole face of the ground.

However, Genesis 2 is focusing on events surrounding the creation of Adam. And this comment is specifically regarding a time during Creation week, prior to Adam’s creation on Day 6 (i.e., “no man to till the ground”).

Therefore, the passage tells us that God hadn’t caused rain to fall up to that particular point during Creation Week. During this time the dry ground that God created on Day 3 was being watered. There is no passage that reveals that the rain remained absent for the approximately 1,650 years between Creation and the Flood.

The mist mentioned in Genesis 2:6 may have been an important means by which God initially watered the earth. Furthermore, Genesis 2:10-14 describes rivers flowing through the pre-Flood world. Though much of this could also be spring fed, it also reveals that the hydrologic cycle was in place.

Oceans, seas, clouds, rivers vapor, and so on are all part of the hydrologic cycle. Photo of the Gold Coast in Australia by Bodie Hodge

This is to be expected since God made the laws of nature and uphold them into existence and had no reason to change them—thus water evaporated and condensed (natural created-properties of water) so water vapor, cloud condensation, and rain should no doubt be realities.

What About Hebrews 11:7?

Hebrews 11:7 says Noah was warned "of things not yet seen." Some interpret this to mean Noah had never seen rain. This is bit of a stretch!

But the verse doesn’t say that. A global Flood had not been seen either! The unprecedented event Noah hadn’t seen was the coming worldwide catastrophic Flood and God's judgment upon mankind. And Bible reveals that is what Noah endured on the Ark.

Was The Rainbow New?

Genesis 9:12-17 also does not necessarily mean that the first rainbow existed after the Flood. Again, it would call into question the very natural laws by which God upholds things into existence.

God could have taken an already-existing phenomenon and given it a new covenant significance. God does this. Similarly, Christ gave bread and wine a special meaning in the Lord's Supper even though bread and wine already existed. Our bodies have become the Temple of the Holy Spirit (i.e., collectively the third Temple, if you will). Man’s bodies existed beforehand and now take on new responsibilities and meanings.

What About The Water Cycle In More Detail?

Ecclesiastes 1:7 describes rivers flowing into the sea while water continually returns to supply them, and passages like Job 36:27-28 describe evaporation, clouds, ice/snow, and rainfall. Scripture therefore recognizes the normal water cycle.

God provides rain regularly for things like fields, crops, and harvests throughout the Bible (e.g., Deuteronomy 11:11-17). Why assume He didn’t do that in His perfectly created world?

When God told Noah that rain would come in the seven days to begin the global Flood (Genesis 7:4), did Noah react in such a way, as to be confused about what rain was if he hadn’t seen it before and had no concept of it? No. Instead Noah did all that God commanded him, knowing full well what the rains would do.  

Red River Gorge in Kentucky has many waterfalls and natural bridges in the park; Photo by Bodie Hodge

Since the pre-Flood world already possessed oceans, rivers, sunlight, and an atmosphere, there is no biblical requirement that this process was absent before Noah. There is no logical reason to insist that teh normal water cycle did not function before the Flood. Thus, this becomes an arbitrary assertion that really isn’t defensible biblically, logically, or scientifically.

Conclusion

Did it rain before the Flood? Though Scripture does not openly tell us, we have no reason to think it didn’t.

The Bible clearly says there had been no rain before Adam was created (Genesis 2:5-6), but it never says there was no rain during the entire pre-Flood era. So one should be careful about applying this verse to an era of time that it wasn’t intended. Therefore, Christians should not teach "no rain before Noah" as established biblical doctrine. Rain before the Flood is totally consistent with Scripture.

Bodie Hodge, Ken Ham's son in law, has been an apologist defending 6-day creation and opposing evolution since 1998. He spent 21 years working at Answers in Genesis as a speaker, writer, and researcher as well as a founding news anchor for Answers News. He was also head of the Oversight Council.  

Bodie launched Biblical Authority Ministries in 2015 as a personal website and it was organized officially in 2025 as a 501(c)(3). He has spoken on multiple continents and hosts of US states in churches, colleges, and universities. He is married with four children.

Mr. Hodge earned a Bachelor and Master of Science degrees from Southern Illinois University at Carbondale (SIUC). Then he taught at SIUC for a couple of years as a Visiting Instructor teaching all levels of undergraduate engineering and running a materials lab and a CAD lab. He did research on advanced ceramic materials to develop a new method of production of titanium diboride with a grant from Lockheed Martin. He worked as a Test Engineer for Caterpillar, Inc., prior to entering full-time ministry.

His love of science was coupled with a love of history, philosophy, and theology. For about one year of his life, Bodie was editing and updating a theological, historical, and scientific dictionary/encyclopedia for AI use and training. Mr. Hodge has over 25 years of experience in writing, speaking and researching in these fields.

 

Wednesday, August 19, 2026

What Was The Date Of Christ's Resurrection?

What Was The Date Of Christ's Resurrection?

Bodie Hodge, M.Sc., B.Sc., PEI

Biblical Authority Ministries, August 19, 2026 (Donate)

This is such a great question! The Bible does not give a modern calendar date for Christ's resurrection—nor did we expect it to. In fact, today, we use the Gregorian calendar which didn’t exist in Christ’s day.

Empty Tomb; Image requested by Bodie Hodge*

An earlier form of the Gregorian was in effect—the Julian calendar—named for Julius Caesar. The Gregorian calendar has leap years and things like that to correct the Julian calendar which would drift slight over centuries.

When we ask the question about Jesus’ resurrection date, it would be convenient to have it on our modern calendars and not use the Julian calendar or the Babylonian calendar (commonly called the Jewish calendar) as the date drifts and moves around compared to our modern calendar.

With that said, the most common date used and defended historically is Sunday, April 5, AD 33 as translated to our modern calendar. This follows from placing the Crucifixion on Friday, April 3, AD 33, with Christ rising on the first day of the week. Of course, you can’t give a date, without some debate, but this date tends to stand up to the scrutiny.

Why Is The Date Debated?

The debate is centered on a range that it could have happened. Obviously, people aren’t arguing the Christ resurrected in AD 1776. We have to go back to time markers given in God’s Word—the absolute authority in all matters.

Then secondarily, we use historical data to help us out. When we do this, we are initially narrowing down the timeframe primarily surrounding AD 33. For example, scriptural time markers give chronological points rather than a numbered Roman year on the Julian calendar.

For instance, historians must correlate the reigns of Tiberius Caesar and Pontius Pilate (Luke 3:1). Both were in power at the same time—one as emperor and the other as governor of Judea under Tiberius.

The Bible tells us that the beginning of John the Baptist's ministry was in Tiberius's fifteenth year. He baptized Jesus after this when He was "about thirty years of age" and this marked when His ministry began (Luke 3:23). Keep in mind that Christ was born about 4 BC (yes, there was an early error in the initial calculation for Christ’s birth—King Herod, who was a lesser king for the region of Judea, under Caesar, died in 3 BC). Jesus was born while King Herod was still alive, but he died soon after that.

The Bible also mentions at least three Passovers that Jesus celebrated (John 2:13; 6:4; 11:55). Some suggest that Jesus, therefore, had His ministry for three years. However, what we can know is that it was at least three years—it could have been a little more.

Another requirement for the crucifixion occurs in connection with the Passover week overlapping with the weekly Sabbath causing it to become a High Day or High Sabbath with Passover itself occurring on the day before the Sabbath (Saturday).

Another mild disagreement arises over ancient Jewish calendars (the Jewish group called the Essenes used a 365-day solar calendar; others used a lunar 354-day calendar with intercalary months). So, mapping these chronological points shows how intense this can get regarding this debate! 

What Dates Sticks Out?

Even with all this, most dates are eliminated quickly as possibilities. First, Pontius Pilate provides firm historical boundaries. Jesus had to have been crucified while Pilate governed Judea, historically and generally without much dispute, this is dated at AD 26-36. Caiaphas provides another historical boundary. Caiaphas served as high priest during the period in which an AD 33 crucifixion would fall (generally from AD 18-36).[1]

Simply consider this next piece of biblical data. The Passover began the day before the Sabbath which is also called the Preparation Day (preparing for the Sabbath, see John 19:31)—that is when the Last Supper took place—it was the Passover meal Jesus shared with His disciples.

Then Jesus was later arrested that night and crucified later that day during the daylight portion of the Passover/Preparation Day; and He was put in the grave prior to the Sabbath which began at sunset. The Pharisees still needed to eat the Passover meal after Jesus was turned over to be crucified (John 18:28).

Doing a little research, we find that (as correlated to our Gregorian calendar), AD 30 was a Thursday, AD 31 was Tuesday, AD 32 was a Monday, AD 33 was a Friday, AD 34 was a Tuesday, AD 35 was a Monday and AD 36 was a Friday.[2]

Crown of Thorns; Image requested by Bodie Hodge*

Thus, most dates can be eliminated as the Passover was not on a Friday for most of these dates. This leaved AD 33 as the reasonable date and AD 36, which is far too late. The AD 36 date would have Jesus being about 40 years old having a about 7-8-year ministry, which seems to be a stretch.

Why Is AD 33 Biblical And Defensible?

Luke places John the Baptist's ministry in the fifteenth year of Tiberius (Luke 3:1-3). Tiberius's reign, based on Roman historical accounts, is reckoned normally from AD 14. This points toward AD 28/29. Jesus began His ministry afterward, and John records at least three Passovers, indicating a ministry extending several years. This fits AD 33 considerably better than AD 30. AD 30 is based on a Thursday crucifixion but then, there would be no need to rush to get Him buried prior to the Sabbath.

A Friday crucifixion also fits the traditional chronology of Friday (1st day); Saturday (2nd day); and Sunday (3rd day). The Bible repeatedly asserts that Jesus was to rise on the third day (Matthew 16:21, Matthew 17:23, Matthew 20:19, Matthew 27:64, Mark 9:31, Mark 10:34, Luke 9:22, Luke 13:32, Luke 18:33, Luke 24:7, Luke 24:21, Luke 24:46, Acts 10:40, 1 Corinthians 15:4).

Jesus indeed rose on the first day of the week (Sunday, now called the Lord’s Day to honor Christ’s resurrection):

Now when He rose early on the first day of the week, He appeared first to Mary Magdalene, out of whom He had cast seven demons. (Mark 16:9, NKJV).

See also Matthew 28:1, Mark 16:2, Luke 24:1, John 20:1, John 20:19. So counting backwards from Sunday being the third day, the Sabbath being the second day, then Friday must be the first day.

This is consistent. Christ died Friday, April 3, AD 33, His resurrection occurred Sunday, April 5, AD 33. Christ rose on the third day. So, while Scripture does not require Christians to affirm a particular modern calendar date, April 5, AD 33 is biblically consistent, historically plausible, and strongly defensible.

Bodie Hodge, Ken Ham's son in law, has been an apologist defending 6-day creation and opposing evolution since 1998. He spent 21 years working at Answers in Genesis as a speaker, writer, and researcher as well as a founding news anchor for Answers News. He was also head of the Oversight Council.  

Bodie launched Biblical Authority Ministries in 2015 as a personal website and it was organized officially in 2025 as a 501(c)(3). He has spoken on multiple continents and hosts of US states in churches, colleges, and universities. He is married with four children.

Mr. Hodge earned a Bachelor and Master of Science degrees from Southern Illinois University at Carbondale (SIUC). Then he taught at SIUC for a couple of years as a Visiting Instructor teaching all levels of undergraduate engineering and running a materials lab and a CAD lab. He did research on advanced ceramic materials to develop a new method of production of titanium diboride with a grant from Lockheed Martin. He worked as a Test Engineer for Caterpillar, Inc., prior to entering full-time ministry.

His love of science was coupled with a love of history, philosophy, and theology. For about one year of his life, Bodie was editing and updating a theological, historical, and scientific dictionary/encyclopedia for AI use and training. Mr. Hodge has over 25 years of experience in writing, speaking and researching in these fields.

*Image generated by ChatGPT


[1] Take note that likely places Caiaphas as a lower level priest around the time Jesus stayed back at the Temple when he was 12.  

[2] As indicated by Larry Pierce in James Ussher, The Annals of the World, translated by Larry and Marion Pierce, Second Printing December 2003, Master Books, Green Forest, Arkansas, page 822.

Monday, August 17, 2026

Salvation by Works: A False Doctrine

Salvation by Works: A False Doctrine

Bodie Hodge, M.Sc., B.Sc., PEI

Biblical Authority Ministries, August 17, 2026 (Donate)

Author and General Editor of the popular book series: World Religion and Cults

If one looks at the state of religion throughout the world, you cannot miss the fact that religions are massively different—even in their ultimate goals. Atheistic worldviews offer no final salvation at all. If death is simply the end of a person and all their works are useless—then there is ultimately no rescue from death, no final restoration, and no eternal hope.

Many Eastern mystical religions offer a very different goal. Some teach various forms of reincarnation that you can work for, enlightenment, liberation, or absorption into an ultimate impersonal reality. The individual hopes to escape the cycle of suffering and distinctions. From a biblical perspective, however, this offers no genuine hope of eternal life with the personal God who created us.

Pagan, moralistic, and works-based religions fare no better. People are told, in one form or another, to do enough good, obey certain rules, perform religious rituals, avoid certain sins, or accumulate enough merit in the hope that things will turn out well in the end. But how much good is enough—and what do you mean by good anyway? How can a sinful person know that the debt of sin has actually been paid? What about the guilt?

Then there are religions that mimic certain aspects of Christianity and look forward to an end result described as heaven, paradise, resurrection with new bodies, or eternal blessing. This includes more than half of the world's population.

Image requested by Bodie Hodge*

But how do we get to heaven? Most religions answer with some form of works. Do this. Avoid that. Perform this ritual. Keep these commandments. Join this religious organization. Accumulate enough merit. Perhaps, if your good outweighs your bad, things will, “cross your fingers”, work out.

Yet God's answer is radically different—and remarkably simple.

God Said What?

According to Scripture, salvation is by God's grace through faith. It is a free gift. We don’t earn it by works.

"For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, not of works, lest anyone should boast" (Ephesians 2:8-9, NKJV).

Salvation is free to us, but it was certainly not without cost to God. We sinned against our infinite and holy Creator and deserved His righteous judgment (Genesis 2:17, 3:19). We could never pay that debt through our own good deeds. In fact, doing good, doesn’t negate that we deserve to be punished by God. We sinned, that needs to be dealt with by a perfect and righteous Judge—God.

Jesus Christ did what we couldn’t do. Christ, God the Son who came in the flesh, lived without sin and died in the place of sinners. He was buried and rose bodily from the dead, showing…and proving…His victory over sin and death (1 Corinthians 15:3-4). Christ fully satisfied God’s wrath on our sin through His death and resurrection. This is why Paul and Silas could answer the Philippian jailer's question so simply:

"Sirs, what must I do to be saved?" (Acts 16:30, NKJV).

Their response wasn’t, "Perform enough good works." It was:

"Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you will be saved" (Acts 16:31, NKJV).

Those who believe in the Jesus Christ of Scripture, trusting in His death, burial, and resurrection for their salvation, are saved. Genuine saving faith will then produce fruit with God’s help. Repentance, obedience, love for God, and good works should flow from salvation, but they don’t purchase salvation. This distinction is essential. We aren’t saved by good works. Bu t instead we are saved and then do good works because of our love for God to be obedient to Him (Ephesians 2:10).

What Are We Saved From Again?

Why do we need a Savior in the first place? The answer goes back to Genesis. God warned Adam concerning the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, "in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die" (Genesis 2:17, NKJV). Adam rebelled against God, and death entered God's once "very good" and perfect creation (Genesis 1:31; Deuteronomy 32:4; Romans 5:12).

Image requested by Bodie Hodge*

The problem is therefore much greater than merely needing to become a slightly better person. We have sinned against our infinite Creator.

“For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God” (Romans 3:23, NKJV).

We sinned in Adam and we sin ever since. And the consequence is death:

"For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord" (Romans 6:23, NKJV).

Apart from Christ, sinners face God's final judgment and the second death (Revelation 20:11-15). We therefore need far more than moral improvement in our actions. We need to be rescued form death!

We need a Savior. The wonderful news is that believers don’t have to live their entire lives wondering whether they have accumulated enough merit. Scripture says believers can know they have eternal life:

“These things I have written to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, that you may know that you have eternal life” (1 John 5:13, NKJV).

When we believe in Jesus Christ (the Son of God), and His death and resurrection, we are saved. Our assurance rests ultimately in Christ, not in our ability to do enough “good works”.

That Seductive Error Of Works

The false doctrine of salvation by works is extremely seductive because it appeals to human pride. We naturally want to contribute something. We want to believe that we helped earn our salvation. But if salvation could be earned, grace would no longer be grace. Paul writes:

"And if by grace, then it is no longer of works; otherwise grace is no longer grace" (Romans 11:6, NKJV).

The world's religions are filled with systems in which people perform works while hoping for something better after death. Islam, for example, rejects the Jesus of Scripture and saving work of Christ and instead incorporates obedience and deeds into its understanding of final judgment—a very sexualized paradise.

Other religious groups likewise require religious works, rituals, ordinances, or organizational loyalty while often redefining Jesus as a created being, lesser divine figure, prophet, or one god among others.

From a Protestant perspective, Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox theology also creates serious problems where sacramental participation, merit, indulgences, or other works are incorporated into the process of justification rather than justification being received through faith apart from works. Protestants historically—and rightly—objected that such systems obscure the sufficiency of Christ's finished work.

The Reformers repeatedly returned to the biblical teaching summarized by the phrase sola fide - faith alone. But Protestants shouldn’t become proud. Protestant churches can fall into similar errors. Sadly, some Protestants teach:

·       Believe in Jesus plus baptism.

·       Believe in Jesus plus confession.

·       Believe in Jesus plus church membership.

·       Believe in Jesus plus speaking in tongues.

·       Believe in Jesus plus a particular spiritual experience.

·       Believe in Jesus plus enough good behavior.

·       Etc.

Whenever something is presented as an additional basis for justification before God, we should immediately compare that teaching with Scripture. Adding unto salvation can be very dangerous!

What About Repentance?

Repentance deserves special attention because Scripture clearly commands people to repent (Acts 17:30). Does that mean repentance is a good work that earns salvation? No.

Biblical repentance is a change of the state of mind and heart regarding God and sin that accompanies genuine faith. When someone truly turns to Christ, that person is turning away from unbelief and rebellion and turns to God. Repentance is therefore inseparably connected with saving faith, but it should never be turned into a merit-based work that purchases or earns God's forgiveness. Keep in mind that repentance is something granted by God (2 Timothy 2:25-26).

Consider someone who says they believe in Jesus and his death and resurrection, but explicitly says they refuse to repent and they love their sin and want to keep sinning. Does this person really have a saving faith in the Jesus Christ of Scripture? No. They still idolize their sin above Christ, and Christ is secondary at best.

Consider someone who says, they need to clean themselves up and repent first before they consider Christ. They do these works in an effort “to be better” so they think they are earning a worthy place before they receive Christ. This too is in error. We don’t clean ourselves up enough to become worthy of Christ. We come to Christ because we aren’t worthy and desperately need His mercy.

Getting Precise

Adding anything to God’s salvation draws one into error—potentially a grave error. Even those who argue carefully sometimes fall into an error that can be subtle. So, I suggest we be gracious. Let me explain.

Consider if someone is arguing that the work of baptism is a requirement for salvation. This is quite common and stems in part from a misunderstanding of Acts 2:37-38. Baptism is extremely important. Christ commanded it (Matthew 28:19), and believers should gladly obey Him.

However, in Acts 2:37, the crowd was cut to the heart by the Gospel message they heard and now believed unto salvation after hearing about Jesus and His death and resurrection.

So, they were saved at that belief. But then they are told in Acts 2:38 to repent and be baptized for the forgiveness of sins. It is easy to see how one might think these factors were conditional for salvation. But these other doctrines of repentance and baptism are distinct from salvation that already occurred in Acts 2:37. This position is called baptismal regeneration.

I once had a person say to me that those who held to baptismal regeneration aren’t saved because they add a work to salvation. But here is where we need to be very careful and get very precise.

A person who errs on the proper understanding of baptism still believes in the Jesus Christ of Scripture and His death and resurrection. So, this person is still saved, regardless of their understanding of the baptism. Just because they have a misunderstanding of baptism—does that negate their salvation in Christ when they believed on Him? No.

But look at the converse. When someone says that a baptismal regenerationist isn’t saved, then they just added something to salvation. Did you catch that? They just added that one must believe in the Jesus Christ of Scripture and His death and resurrection PLUS also they must have the correct understanding of baptism to be saved.

If someone has a false Christ, then we can certainly point out that that person is not saved. For instance, if one denies that Christ came in the flesh (i.e., God in the flesh) then they are an anti-Christ and not saved.

If someone suggest they are good enough for heaven based on their works, then they aren’t saved because they haven’t believed in Jesus. But we need to be careful to see if they believe in the correct Jesus of the Bible and His death and resurrection—that is the key.

Image requested by Bodie Hodge*

This is where Christians need to be careful. It is possible to oppose works-based salvation so aggressively that we accidentally create another requirement for salvation. If perfect doctrinal understanding were necessary for salvation, none of us could have assurance because we would constantly wonder whether some theological misunderstanding had invalidated our faith.

This doesn’t make theological error unimportant. False teaching should be identified and corrected from Scripture. But we must distinguish between an error about a secondary doctrine and an error that destroys the object or basis of saving faith. Throughout Scripture, salvation is repeatedly connected to believing in Christ.

Consider Cornelius and his household. The Holy Spirit came upon them before their water baptism (Acts 10:43-48). Their baptism followed as an act of obedience and public identification with Christ.

The thief on the cross provides another important example. He had no opportunity to be baptized, join a local church, take communion, accumulate years of good works, or complete a religious program. Yet Christ told him:

"Assuredly, I say to you, today you will be with Me in Paradise" (Luke 23:43, NKJV).

Christ was enough. Other passages compliment this (NKJV):

·       Acts 16:30-34: And he brought them out and said, “Sirs, what must I do to be saved?” So they said, “Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you will be saved, you and your household.”

·       John 3:16-18: “For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. “For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved. “He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.

·       Romans 10:9-11: that if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved.  For with the heart one believes unto righteousness, and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. For the Scripture says, “Whoever believes on Him will not be put to shame.”

·       Romans 3:22: The righteousness of God, through faith in Jesus Christ, to all and on all who believe. For there is no difference.

·       Ephesians 1:13: In Him you also trusted, after you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation; in whom also, having believed, you were sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise.

·       Mark 16:16: “He who believes and is baptized will be saved; but he who does not believe will be condemned.

·       Romans 9:3: As it is written: “Behold, I lay in Zion a stumbling stone and rock of offense, And whoever believes on Him will not be put to shame.”

·       Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes.

·       Galatians 2:16: “knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law but by faith in Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Christ Jesus, that we might be justified by faith in Christ and not by the works of the law; for by the works of the law no flesh shall be justified.

·       Galatians 3:22: But the Scripture has confined all under sin, that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to those who believe.

·       1 Timothy 1:16: However, for this reason I obtained mercy, that in me first Jesus Christ might show all longsuffering, as a pattern to those who are going to believe on Him for everlasting life.

When Does Error Become Fatal?

We should distinguish between misunderstanding something about salvation and trusting in something other than Christ for salvation.

Suppose a person says:

"I am going to heaven because I have lived a good enough life."

That person is trusting in his own righteousness rather than Christ. They aren’t saved.

Suppose someone says:

"I don't need Jesus. My religious works will save me."

Again, Christ has been rejected. They aren’t saved.

Or suppose someone denies the biblical identity of Christ altogether. Scripture warns strongly about false Christs and those who deny Jesus Christ coming in the flesh (1 John 4:1-3; 2 John 7). A counterfeit Jesus cannot save.

This is why Paul's warning in Galatians is so severe. Certain teachers wanted to add circumcision and law-keeping to justification. Paul responded:

"Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law but by faith in Jesus Christ" (Galatians 2:16, NKJV).

The question we should ask isn’t merely, "Does this person have every doctrine perfectly correct?" Rather, we should be asking, who are they trusting to save them?

Are they trusting Jesus Christ and His finished work? Or are they ultimately trusting themselves, their works, their rituals, their church, their goodness, or a false version of Christ? That distinction matters enormously.

But Aren't Good Works Important?

Absolutely! Rejecting salvation by works doesn’t mean rejecting good works. James famously says:

"Faith without works is dead" (James 2:26, NKJV).

James isn’t contradicting Paul. Paul explains the basis of justification: we are justified through faith apart from works. James explains the evidence of genuine faith: real faith produces fruit.

In the same way, Christians do good works because God has saved them. Good works demonstrate genuine faith; they don’t purchase eternal life. If you see someone professing to be a Christian and their works are the opposite…then you can judge a fruit by its tree! That person isn’t living as a saved person does. Jesus said that a tree is known by its fruit (Matthew 7:17-20). Paul likewise teaches that believers were "created in Christ Jesus for good works" (Ephesians 2:10, NKJV).

So good works have their proper place—but they aren’t essential to salvation—Christ is. Works are the fruit of salvation, not the basis of salvation.

Final Thoughts

Don’t add to God's salvation. Christ didn’t “almost accomplish salvation” and leave us to finish the job. His work was sufficient to unto salvation—only His work. On the cross, Jesus declared:

"It is finished!" (John 19:30, NKJV).

That should give every believer tremendous comfort. Our salvation doesn’t rest upon whether we have performed enough religious rituals, accumulated enough good deeds, attended church enough times, been baptized correctly enough, given enough money, or understood every secondary doctrine perfectly. Our salvation rests in Jesus Christ and His work alone.

At the same time, we should be cautious when evaluating others. Some theological errors genuinely undermine the Gospel by replacing the biblical Christ or substituting human merit for His finished work. Other errors are serious misunderstandings held by people who nevertheless genuinely trust Christ. Salvation isn’t Christ plus our works. Salvation is found in Christ alone.

"For whoever calls on the name of the LORD shall be saved" (Romans 10:13, NKJV).

Bodie Hodge, Ken Ham's son in law, has been an apologist defending 6-day creation and opposing evolution since 1998. He spent 21 years working at Answers in Genesis as a speaker, writer, and researcher as well as a founding news anchor for Answers News. He was also head of the Oversight Council.  

Bodie launched Biblical Authority Ministries in 2015 as a personal website and it was organized officially in 2025 as a 501(c)(3). He has spoken on multiple continents and hosts of US states in churches, colleges, and universities. He is married with four children.

Mr. Hodge earned a Bachelor and Master of Science degrees from Southern Illinois University at Carbondale (SIUC). Then he taught at SIUC for a couple of years as a Visiting Instructor teaching all levels of undergraduate engineering and running a materials lab and a CAD lab. He did research on advanced ceramic materials to develop a new method of production of titanium diboride with a grant from Lockheed Martin. He worked as a Test Engineer for Caterpillar, Inc., prior to entering full-time ministry.

His love of science was coupled with a love of history, philosophy, and theology. For about one year of his life, Bodie was editing and updating a theological, historical, and scientific dictionary/encyclopedia for AI use and training. Mr. Hodge has over 25 years of experience in writing, speaking and researching in these fields.

*Image generated by ChatGPT

 

Thursday, August 13, 2026

Biblical Objections To The False Doctrine Of Purgatory

Biblical Objections To The False Doctrine Of Purgatory

Bodie Hodge, M.Sc., B.Sc., PEI

Biblical Authority Ministries, August 13, 2026 (Donate)

Purgatory is a teaching of the Roman church. Due to biblical teachings, Protestant Christians objected to many of Rome’s teachings—including that of purgatory.

Protestants rightly reject purgatory because it conflicts and contradicts with several clear biblical teachings. When something contradicts God’s Word, it is wrong. So, what is purgatory and why is purgatory wrong biblically? Let’s dive into it.

What Is Purgatory?

Purgatory is a [false] doctrine taught by the Roman Catholic Church concerning what happens after death to certain people who die in God's grace. It isn’t considered a second chance for unbelievers to be saved. Rather, Catholic teaching describes purgatory as a temporary state of purification for those who die ultimately destined for heaven but who still require purification from the effects of sin (i.e., a secondary “purging” of sin process).

According to Roman Catholic theology, Christ forgives the eternal punishment of sin, but temporal punishment or remaining consequences of forgiven sin may still need to be purified. This purification can allegedly occur during one’s earthly life or, according to the doctrine of purgatory, after death.

Roman view after death; Image requested by Bodie Hodge*

Catholics have traditionally connected this teaching with prayers for the dead, indulgences, and apocryphal books (e.g., 2 Maccabees 12:42-46). Some might even appeal to an odd interpretation of 1 Corinthians 3:10-15 to suggest purgatory, but that is without warrant. 

Christ's Sacrifice Fully Pays For Sin

Most Protestants reject purgatory because it isn’t taught in the 66 books of Scripture and conflicts with the complete sufficiency of Christ's atonement. We point instead to passages such as Hebrews 10:10-14, Romans 8:1, Luke 23:43, and 2 Corinthians 5:8, arguing that believers who die are with Christ rather than undergoing additional punishment or further sin purification before being pure enough to enter heaven.

One of the strongest objections to purgatory, therefore, is the sufficiency of Christ's atonement. Scripture presents Jesus' sacrifice as completely sufficient for the believer's sins. Nothing else is required—no works, and definitely no purgatory to further satisfy God’s wrath on your sin.

"For by one offering He has perfected forever those who are being sanctified." (Hebrews 10:14, NKJV)

Jesus declared from the cross, "It is finished!" (John 19:30). The Holy Spirit in the book of Hebrews points out that Christ offered Himself "once for all" (Hebrews 7:27; 9:12; 10:10). To say we still need our sins purged in purgatory is in clear violation and in mockery of what Christ did on the Cross.  

Therefore, Protestants argue that believers don’t need a post-death purification involving punishment or satisfaction for remaining temporal penalties. Christ has already borne the punishment their sins deserve (Isaiah 53:5-6; 1 Peter 2:24).

Purgatory isn’t merely a doctrine lacking sufficient biblical evidence. It strikes at the sufficiency of Christ's atonement. The believer's hope should, therefore, rest entirely upon Christ's work and His righteousness rather than Christ's work plus additional punishment after death.

Believers Are Fully Justified By Faith

Scripture teaches that those who trust in Christ are justified, or declared righteous, before God.

"Therefore, having been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ." (Romans 5:1, NKJV)

Likewise,

"There is therefore now no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus" (Romans 8:1, NKJV).

Protestants therefore object that purgatory appears inconsistent with the believer's complete justification. The Christian's righteousness before God rests upon Christ, not upon additional suffering after death (Romans 3:21-28; Philippians 3:9).

When we receive Jesus Christ, His pure, perfect righteousness is imputed or transferred to us. Christ took our sin and the punishment for it and clothes us in His perfection. This is why we are seen as spotless on Judgment Day. So, when one says, “Christ’s sacrifice wasn’t good enough and you still need to have your sins purged in purgatory”, it is a blatant denial of Christ’s perfect righteousness and His imputation of that righteousness to us (see Romans 4:5-25).

Believers Who Die Go To Be With Christ

The New Testament commonly presents death for the Christian as departure to be with Christ rather than entrance into an intermediate place of purification.

Paul desired "to depart and be with Christ" (Philippians 1:23). He also wrote that being "absent from the body" meant being "present with the Lord" (2 Corinthians 5:8).

Jesus told the repentant thief:

"Assuredly, I say to you, today you will be with Me in Paradise." (Luke 23:43, NKJV)

There is no mention of the thief first being confined to purification in purgatory!

Judgment Follows Death

God states in the book of Hebrews:

"And as it is appointed for men to die once, but after this the judgment." (Hebrews 9:27, NKJV)

Scripture speaks of death followed by judgment—not purgatory. The destinies of the saved and lost are one of two places (Heaven and Hell)—not three—even if it is alleged to be temporary (Matthew 25:46; Revelation 20:11-15). Christians argue that Scripture never clearly establishes a third post-death state in which justified believers suffer temporarily to be purified before entering heaven.

The biblical view as held by Protestants; Image requested by Bodie Hodge*

Christians certainly undergo sanctification during this life, and their works will be evaluated by Christ (1 Corinthians 3:11-15; 2 Corinthians 5:10). But the testing of a believer's works isn’t the same thing as the believer being punished in purgatory.

Purgatory Isn’t Clearly Taught In Scripture

Protestants argue that no passage in the 66 books of Scripture explicitly teaches the doctrine of purgatory. Some Roman Catholic arguments appeal especially to 2 Maccabees 12:38-46, but rightly Protestants don’t recognize the books of the Apocrypha/Deuterocanon as inspired Scripture.

Other passages sometimes used to support purgatory, such as Matthew 12:32 and 1 Corinthians 3:15, are interpreted by Protestants differently using proper hermeneutics (interpreting Scripture with Scripture). First Corinthians 3, for example, describes a person's works being tested by fire, not a saved person's soul being purified through suffering.

Purgatory Undermined Assurance Of Salvation

Christians should rest in God's promises and Christ's finished work rather than live in uncertainty about whether punishment for sin remained after death.

Do not forget to connected assurance of salvation with justification by faith through God's grace. If a justified Christian must still undergo punishment after death, then this would render our rest and comfort in Christ meaningless (Romans 5:1, Romans 8:1, and Romans 8:33-39).

Purgatory Was Closely Connected With The Abuse Of Indulgences To Drive Money-Making

This was enormously important historically for Luther—just look at the 95 Theses. The Roman system of indulgences was connected with the remission of temporal punishment for sins, including concern for souls believed to be suffering in purgatory. If you “pay” the church, they could relieve this punishment being dolled out by God on people they cared about. It was quite the scheme!

Selling indulgences to reduce time in purgatory; Image requested by Bodie Hodge*

Luther's 95 Theses of 1517 repeatedly addressed purgatory and indulgences. He especially objected to claims that purchasing indulgences could benefit departed souls. His controversy over indulgences became one of the sparks of the Protestant Reformation.

It is important historically, however, that Luther didn’t reject every concept associated with purgatory immediately in 1517. His position developed as his conflict with Rome progressed as can be ascertained by his extensive writings.

Scripture Does Not Authorize Christians To Make Satisfaction For Sin After Death

The Reformers distinguished God's fatherly discipline of Christians in this life from judicial punishment intended to satisfy divine justice. In other words, God growing us and disciplining us for sanctification and maturity in our faith here on earth is not the same thing that a post-death punishment, pre-heaven punishment.

Hebrews 12:5-11 certainly teaches that God disciplines His children. But this is different from saying Christians must suffer after death to satisfy temporal punishment remaining because of forgiven sins. Christ's satisfaction was sufficient:

"And He Himself is the propitiation for our sins." (1 John 2:2, NKJV)

This became particularly important in theologies coming out of the Reformation.

Purgatory Encouraged Practices The Reformers Considered Unbiblical

Purgatory did not exist merely as an abstract doctrine. It was connected with prayers and masses for the dead, indulgences, almsgiving on behalf of the deceased, and other practices intended to assist departed Christians.

The Reformers asked a basic question: Where did Christ or the apostles command the church to conduct such practices to shorten the suffering of departed believers? We should echo this same question!

Because Reformers believed Scripture to be the church's supreme authority, the absence of clear biblical authorization was a serious objection. If Rome appealed to themselves (mere men compared to God), which they did when they proclaimed papal and church authority, they lost the debate immediately. People in church—including leaders—are not in a position to supersede God and His Word.

The Biblical "Fire" Passages Were Being Misinterpreted

First Corinthians 3:13-15 became particularly important:

"If anyone's work is burned, he will suffer loss; but he himself will be saved, yet so as through fire." (1 Corinthians 3:15, NKJV)

Catholic theologians sometimes associated this passage with purgatorial purification. Note the contextual shift—Paul says the person's "work" is tested. The context concerns the quality of what someone has built upon the foundation of Jesus Christ (1 Corinthians 3:11-15), not a description of souls suffering in purgatory. Thus as mentioned, the Roman claim is without warrant.

Conclusion

During the Reformation, believers objected to more than simply saying, "The word purgatory isn't in the Bible." Luther, Calvin, and other Reformers believed the doctrine was tied to a larger system involving indulgences, masses for the dead, satisfaction for temporary punishment, and uncertainty about one's standing before God. And they were correct indeed! 

Protestants underlying concern was that these teachings and practices not only lacked scriptural support but denied many passages that clearly taught something else. The idea of purgatory negates justification by faith and the complete and perfect sufficiency of Christ's work. In other words, via this view, Christ didn’t do good enough.

Our primary objection to purgatory ultimately centers on the finished work of Jesus Christ. Christ paid for sin completely, believers are justified by faith, there is no condemnation for those in Christ. Christians who die are with the Lord, and Scripture nowhere clearly establishes purgatory.

As Protestants, we generally regard purgatory as an unnecessary, burdensome, and errant addition to the biblical doctrines of justification, sanctification, judgment, and Christ's sufficient atonement.

Bodie Hodge, Ken Ham's son in law, has been an apologist defending 6-day creation and opposing evolution since 1998. He spent 21 years working at Answers in Genesis as a speaker, writer, and researcher as well as a founding news anchor for Answers News. He was also head of the Oversight Council.  

Bodie launched Biblical Authority Ministries in 2015 as a personal website and it was organized officially in 2025 as a 501(c)(3). He has spoken on multiple continents and hosts of US states in churches, colleges, and universities. He is married with four children.

Mr. Hodge earned a Bachelor and Master of Science degrees from Southern Illinois University at Carbondale (SIUC). Then he taught at SIUC for a couple of years as a Visiting Instructor teaching all levels of undergraduate engineering and running a materials lab and a CAD lab. He did research on advanced ceramic materials to develop a new method of production of titanium diboride with a grant from Lockheed Martin. He worked as a Test Engineer for Caterpillar, Inc., prior to entering full-time ministry.

His love of science was coupled with a love of history, philosophy, and theology. For about one year of his life, Bodie was editing and updating a theological, historical, and scientific dictionary/encyclopedia for AI use and training. Mr. Hodge has over 25 years of experience in writing, speaking and researching in these fields.

*Image generated by ChatGPT

 

Did It Rain Before The Flood?

  Did It Rain Before The Flood? Bodie Hodge, M.Sc., B.Sc., PEI Biblical Authority Ministries, August 21, 2026 ( Donate ) An all-to-oft...