Friday, October 9, 2026

What Spices Were Used In Jesus' Burial?

What Spices Were Used In Jesus' Burial?

Bodie Hodge, M.Sc., B.Sc., PEI

Biblical Authority Ministries, October 9, 2026 (Donate)

When someone is sentenced to be put to death on a cross, those who cared were already preparing for their death and burial.[1] Jesus was different. There were indeed many who cared—even if they were fearful for their own lives.

But because of the sudden arrest, judgment, and immediacy of the cross. Many weren't prepared for the sudden burial of Christ. Even so, the burial of Jesus Christ involved a remarkable quantity of aromatic spices, particularly myrrh and aloes. This was because a wealthy and respected man stepped in at the last moment—Nicodemus.

Dried Myrrh Saplings; Image requested by Bodie Hodge*

These spices, like myrrh and aloes, were hard to come by and thus, they were expensive. But they were fragrant, which helps mask the smell of a rotting corpse. So certain spices were traditionally associated with the dead.

What Does The Bible Say?

The Gospel of John probably provides the clearest account of the spices used in preparing Jesus' body for burial. John 19:39-40 (NKJV) records:

"And Nicodemus, who at first came to Jesus by night, also came, bringing a mixture of myrrh and aloes, about a hundred pounds. Then they took the body of Jesus, and bound it in strips of linen with the spices, as the custom of the Jews is to bury."

The passage reveals two main burial spices: myrrh and aloes. However, it doesn't specify how much of each was used but we can do some estimates.

How Much Was Used?

Nicodemus brought approximately 100 Roman pounds (Greek: litras) of myrrh and aloes combined. A Roman pound weighed approximately 327 grams, making the total about 32.7 kilograms, or 72 modern American pounds—if the conversion ratios are correct historically.

This was an extraordinary quantity of burial aromatics. Such an abundance meant it was costly. Nevertheless, the exact proportions are unknown. For example, the mixture could have contained 50 Roman pounds of myrrh and 50 Roman pounds of aloes; it could have been 90 Roman pounds of aloes and 10 Roman pounds of myrrh. But Scripture simply doesn’t say.

The 100 pounds refers to the combined weight of the aromatic burial spices. They may have a variety of dried resins, oils (e.g., Song of Solomon 5:5), powdered aromatics, and fragrant wood.

Then there are the spices that were never used—later brought but Christ had already resurrected. Consider Luke 23:56a (NKJV): 

Then they returned and prepared spices and fragrant oils.

We also read in Luke:

Now on the first day of the week, very early in the morning, they, and certain other women with them, came to the tomb bringing the spices which they had prepared. (Luke 24:1, NKJV)

Mark 16:1-4 (NKJV) also reveals:

Now when the Sabbath was past, Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James, and Salome bought spices, that they might come and anoint Him.  Very early in the morning, on the first day of the week, they came to the tomb when the sun had risen. And they said among themselves, “Who will roll away the stone from the door of the tomb for us?” But when they looked up, they saw that the stone had been rolled away — for it was very large.

So the women came back to Christ’s tomb on early Sunday morning bringing spices to anoint His body. After his initial burial, they prepared spices and oils (remember, they were initially unprepared). Then, they came to the gravesite early in the morning with the spices they prepared.

We don’t know the quantity of spices they brought—it could have been a lot. The ladies bought more spices besides what they initially mustered. Did they carry the spices, did they use wheeled cart, did they use a donkey? We simply don’t know.

Did the women know that Nicodemus already used spices at the last moment when Christ was wrapped in linens? Did they think they needed to bring the full portion to treat a body? Or were they bringing supplemental spices because the initial spices used may not have been enough since the job was rushed as Sabbath approached? These are all good questions to which we may not know the answer this side of heaven!

What Was Myrrh?

Myrrh is an aromatic gum resin (i.e., harvested and dried sap). We get it from certain trees of the genus Commiphora, especially Commiphora myrrha. These trees grow in northeastern Africa and Arabia. So getting myrrh was rare in Israel and had to be imported as great cost. Can you see why it was an expensive gift given to Christ at His birth?

Myrrh has a distinctive bittersweet fragrance and was used in perfumes, incense, for medicines (e.g., pain dulling), and obviously burial practices. Its pleasant aroma helped mask the odors associated with death and decomposition of the body.

Myrrh was very valuable and often associated with wealth and royalty. Interestingly, myrrh appears at both the beginning and end of Jesus' earthly life.

  • Matthew 2:11: The Magi presented the young Jesus with gold, frankincense, and myrrh.
  • Mark 15:23: Jesus was offered wine mixed with myrrh before His crucifixion, but He refused it.
  • John 19:39: Nicodemus brought myrrh for Jesus' burial.

The myrrh presented by the Magi has traditionally been understood as foreshadowing Christ's suffering and death, and specifically the Office of the Prophets, who were often wrongly shamed and put to death.

What did Mary and Joseph do with Christ’s myrrh? Great question. Is it possible it was saved and used for Christ’s burial? Though it is a nice thought, the shelf life of dried myrrh is usually less than 5 years.

What Were The Aloes?

The aloes mentioned in John 19:39 were probably aromatic wood, often identified with Agarwood (also called aloeswood ) or Aquilaria, rather than the succulent Aloe vera commonly used today.

Aloeswood or Agarwood is an aromatic wood; Image requested by Bodie Hodge*

As a fragrant wood, it was highly prized. It could be ground or shaved and was used in perfumes and burial preparations. Its smelly, delicate fragrance complemented the aroma of myrrh.

Psalm 45:8 lists myrrh, aloes, and cassia with royal garments. Cassia is groups of flowering trees and some associate cinnamon-producing trees to this name as well. This shows an interesting biblical connection between fragrant substances and kingship or wealth. Christ is King of Kings after all. 

Ground Cassia spice; Image requested by Bodie Hodge*

Why Were These Spices Significant?

The spices are a way of honoring Jesus in death. Joseph of Arimathea provided a new, unused tomb, while Nicodemus supplied an unusually large quantity of costly burial spices.

The abundance of spices could be appropriate for someone of royal importance. Whether the Romans realized it or not, as Jesus was mocked as the King of the Jews during His crucifixion (Matthew 27:29, 37), His burial included honors that could be considered royal and with dignity.

These preparations show that Christ’s followers genuinely expected to bury a dead body and it remain in the grave. They weren’t preparing for His resurrection.

The fact that spices were prepared and/or put on the body also reveals the state of mind that the apostles and Jesus’ followers anticipated. Yet, they failed to remember! Jesus Christ bodily rose from the dead on the third day, just as He had foretold (e.g., Luke 24:6-7).

The burial spices reveal the love shown to Jesus in honoring His body. But His empty tomb reveals His love for us and testifies to His victory over death.

□

Bodie Hodge, Ken Ham's son in law, has been an apologist defending 6-day creation and opposing evolution since 1998. He spent 21 years working at Answers in Genesis as a speaker, writer, and researcher as well as a founding news anchor for Answers News. He was also head of the Oversight Council.  

Bodie launched Biblical Authority Ministries in 2015 as a personal website and it was organized officially in 2025 as a 501(c)(3). He has spoken on multiple continents and hosts of US states in churches, colleges, and universities. He is married with four children.

Mr. Hodge earned a Bachelor and Master of Science degrees from Southern Illinois University at Carbondale (SIUC). Then he taught at SIUC for a couple of years as a Visiting Instructor teaching all levels of undergraduate engineering and running a materials lab and a CAD lab. He did research on advanced ceramic materials to develop a new method of production of titanium diboride with a grant from Lockheed Martin. He worked as a Test Engineer for Caterpillar, Inc., prior to entering full-time ministry.

His love of science was coupled with a love of history, philosophy, and theology. For about one year of his life, Bodie was editing and updating a theological, historical, and scientific dictionary/encyclopedia. Mr. Hodge has over 25 years of experience in writing, speaking and researching in these fields.

*Image by generative program as requested by Bodie Hodge


[1] Although many poor criminals were likely short of those who cared for them and their grave was likely a common pit as disposed of by the Romans.

Thursday, October 8, 2026

Who Else In The Bible Died And Were Brought Back (Besides Jesus)?

Who Else In The Bible Died And Were Brought Back (Besides Jesus)?

Bodie Hodge, M.Sc., B.Sc., PEI

Biblical Authority Ministries, October 8, 2026 (Donate)

I sometimes feel for Lazarus! He died, and it was likely a painful death. Then he comes out of the grave alive by the power of Christ. I often wondered if one of the first things running through his mind was, “you’ve got to be kidding me, I have to die twice!”

Lazarus wasn’t alone in his resurrection. The Bible records at least nine distinct accounts of people being restored to life after death. Nevertheless, these other resurrections include three Old Testament accounts and six New Testament accounts, one of which involves an unspecified number of people. This excludes the resurrection of Jesus Christ, whose resurrection bears a significance not worthy of being in a mere list next to others.

Lazarus after his resurrection was probably hungry! Image requested by Bodie Hodge*

God has power over death and these miraculous events prove it. However, an important distinction must be made between being restored to ordinary physical life, as Lazarus was, and being resurrected into a glorified, immortal body, as Jesus Christ was (e.g., Romans 6:9; 1 Corinthians 15:42-49).

This general resurrection is what we look forward to for an eternity with God through the blood of Jesus Christ. This is when we will have new resurrected bodies (e.g., 1 Corinthians 15:52). The instances in Scripture are largely that of returning to physical life as we currently know it. Let’s begin with the Old Testament and flow through chronologically.

Old Testament Accounts

1. The Widow of Zarephath's Son (1 Kings 17:17-24)

In Elijah's day, a widow's son where he was lodging became very sick and died. Elijah carried the boy upstairs, prayed to the Lord, and stretched himself over the child three times. God answered his prayer, and the boy’s soul returned and miraculously came back to life. This is the first explicitly recorded resurrection back to life after death in Scripture.

2. The Shunammite Woman's Son (2 Kings 4:18-37)

A young boy died suddenly after complaining about his head. His mother sought the prophet Elisha, who returned to her home, laid his staff over him, prayed, and then he stretched himself over the boy. The child became warm, sneezed seven times, and opened his eyes.

3. The Man Who Touched Elisha's Bones (2 Kings 13:20-21)

After Elisha died, another deceased man was hastily placed in Elisha's tomb because of approaching Moabite raiders. When the man's body touched Elisha's bones, he revived and stood on his feet. One can’t help but see hints of the double portion of Elijah’s spirit placed on Elisha (2 Kings 2:9). Where Elijah was used by God to resurrect the widow’s son, Elijah was used by God to bring two back to life!

New Testament Accounts

4. Jairus's Daughter (Matthew 9:18-26; Mark 5:35-43; Luke 8:49-56)

As we flip to the New Testament, Jesus restored a twelve-year-old girl to life after her death. Taking her by the hand, He commanded her to arise. She immediately stood up and walked.

5. The Widow of Nain's Son (Luke 7:11-17)

Jesus encountered a funeral procession in the city of Nain carrying the only son of a widow. Moved with compassion, Jesus approached the bier and commanded the young man to arise. He sat up and began speaking.

6. Lazarus of Bethany (John 11:1-44)

Lazarus had been dead for four days when Jesus arrived. Despite concerns about decomposition, Jesus commanded Lazarus to come out of the tomb. Lazarus emerged alive, still wrapped in burial cloths. This miracle powerfully demonstrated Jesus' authority over death.

Note in the instances of Jesus raising people from the dead, He did it by His power and authority, since He is God.

7. The Saints Raised Following Jesus' Death (Matthew 27:52-53)

God’s Word records that many bodies of deceased saints were raised and subsequently appeared to people in Jerusalem after Jesus' resurrection. This was surely a shock to many, who might recognize them, but to others, they may not even have been noticed—especially if they were saints from long ago. Also, we don’t know the precise number of resurrectees, nor do we know their names. Their ultimate fate isn’t explained either! So Scripture doesn’t explicitly establish whether they later died again or were taken into heaven as “first fruits”.

8. Tabitha (Dorcas) (Acts 9:36-42)

Tabitha, a Christian woman known for her charitable works, became sick and died. Peter prayed to the Lord and then commanded her to arise, and presented her alive to the believers.

9. Eutychus (Acts 20:7-12)

While Paul was preaching, Eutychus fell asleep and tumbled from a third-story window. This is why we shouldn’t fall asleep in church! The Bible records that he was dead. Paul embraced him, and the young man was subsequently brought back to life. I wonder if he had one of those dreams where you are falling, though I digress!

What About Jesus Christ?

Jesus' resurrection stands apart from these accounts. Jesus laid down His life willingly on our behalf. Furthermore, Lazarus and the others were restored to mortal life, whereas Jesus rose bodily, glorified, and immortal, never to die again (Romans 6:9; Revelation 1:18).

Our Lord has all authority on heaven and earth and He ascended into heaven and with His glorified, resurrected body. He sits at the right hand of power on the Throne of God ruling over heaven and earth as the King of Kings and Lord of Lords.

Crown of our suffering Savior and King; Image requested by Bodie Hodge*

Conclusion

You would think that when the Pharisees and chief priests heard about Lazarus[1] being raised to life, that they would recognize the power of God in Jesus Christ—because of the Old Testament instances of God raising people back to life. But they didn’t. Instead, they plotted to kill Lazarus! Oh, the murderous thoughts of those who opposed Christ.

Shortly after Lazarus was raised, the Jews arrested Jesus and began the torturous process of his beatings and crucifixion by the hands of the Romans. But Christ had the power to lay down His life and take it up again.

The Bible recorded nine different accounts of people being restored to life, including the many saints mentioned in Matthew 27. Thus, the number of individuals is greater than nine, and the exact total is simply unknown. But we will all be raised at the general resurrection.

The power of God unto resurrection should give a taste of how amazing our God of Life is. And these should obvious shadows pointing to the resurrection of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ (John 11:25-26; 1 Corinthians 15:20-22).

□

Bodie Hodge, Ken Ham's son in law, has been an apologist defending 6-day creation and opposing evolution since 1998. He spent 21 years working at Answers in Genesis as a speaker, writer, and researcher as well as a founding news anchor for Answers News. He was also head of the Oversight Council.  

Bodie launched Biblical Authority Ministries in 2015 as a personal website and it was organized officially in 2025 as a 501(c)(3). He has spoken on multiple continents and hosts of US states in churches, colleges, and universities. He is married with four children.

Mr. Hodge earned a Bachelor and Master of Science degrees from Southern Illinois University at Carbondale (SIUC). Then he taught at SIUC for a couple of years as a Visiting Instructor teaching all levels of undergraduate engineering and running a materials lab and a CAD lab. He did research on advanced ceramic materials to develop a new method of production of titanium diboride with a grant from Lockheed Martin. He worked as a Test Engineer for Caterpillar, Inc., prior to entering full-time ministry.

His love of science was coupled with a love of history, philosophy, and theology. For about one year of his life, Bodie was editing and updating a theological, historical, and scientific dictionary/encyclopedia. Mr. Hodge has over 25 years of experience in writing, speaking and researching in these fields.

*Image by generative program as requested by Bodie Hodge

 



[1] I’ve always pondered if there was connection between Lazarus and the one mentioned in Luke 16:19-31. Though I seriously doubt they are the same for good reasons not discussed here, one can’t help but draw the parallel that someone named Lazarus was the one in both instances that was the center point of a resurrection after he died.

Wednesday, October 7, 2026

Three Days And Three Nights Or The Third Day?

Three Days And Three Nights Or The Third Day?

Bodie Hodge, M.Sc., B.Sc., PEI

Biblical Authority Ministries, October 6, 2026 (Donate)

Some people suggest there is a contradiction in the counting for duration of Christ’s body in the grave. But this allegation fades when you understand it properly.[1] But it concerns Christ's crucifixion and resurrection and specifically, how long He was in the grave. 

So why is this an issue? It has to do with the Jonah passage.

Then some of the scribes and Pharisees answered, saying, “Teacher, we want to see a sign from You.” But He answered and said to them, “An evil and adulterous generation seeks after a sign, and no sign will be given to it except the sign of the prophet Jonah. “For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the great fish, so will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth. “The men of Nineveh will rise up in the judgment with this generation and condemn it, because they repented at the preaching of Jonah; and indeed a greater than Jonah is here. (Matthew 12:38-41, NKJV).

Some interpret “three days and three nights” as requiring three complete 24-hour periods, or 72 hours. This has led some Christians to argue for a Thursday crucifixion (a few even say Wednesday) rather than the traditional Friday crucifixion.

However, Scripture repeatedly says Christ would rise/rose "the third day" (Luke 18:33; Luke 24:46; Acts 10:40; 1 Corinthians 15:4). A strict 72-hour interpretation creates a perceived difficulty: after three complete days and nights have elapsed, the resurrection would seemingly occur on the fourth day rather than the third day. See the alleged difficulty now?

The body of Christ was laid in a new grave to which no one had been laid before. Image requested by Bodie Hodge*

How To Count The Days

One of the key issues is how days were counted in biblical culture. Ancient Jewish reckoning could count part of a day as belonging to that day.

For instance, in the Bible’s book of Esther, it provides an important Old Testament example. Esther requested that the Jews "neither eat nor drink for three days, night or day" before she approached the king (Esther 4:16). Yet Esther 5:1 says that she went before the king "on the third day," rather than waiting until three complete 24-hour periods had expired.

Another example occurs in Matthew 27:63-64. The chief priests and Pharisees remembered Jesus saying, "After three days I will rise." Yet they asked Pilate to secure the tomb "until the third day." Apparently, they understood "after three days" and "the third day" as compatible and equivocal expressions.

We still do this today to a certain degree. If I said I left on Monday and arrived on Saturday, I would have no problem saying that it took me six days to arrive. Does this mean I took six full days of nights and days to arrive and actually made it to my destination on the seventh day? No. Yet, the way I wrote this (“it took me six days”) is inclusive of days and nights (e.g., a 24-hour day).  

Consequently, expressions such as "three days and three nights," "after three days," and "the third day" aren’t in contradict with one another. So any alleged difficulty is solved when you understand the meaning behind the phrases as used culturally at the time.

Even so, this now brings us to the issue of what day Jesus was crucified.

Count Backwards: Sunday (3rd), Saturday (2nd), Friday (1st)

On the Friday-crucifixion understanding, Friday counts as the 1st day, even though Jesus died around the ninth hour (~3 pm by our modern reckoning) and was buried later that day. Saturday was the 2nd day. Sunday was the 3rd day, and Christ rose early that morning.

·       Friday - Day 1: Crucifixion and burial

·       Saturday - Day 2: Christ remained in the tomb

·       Sunday - Day 3: Resurrection

This also fits the statements that Jesus died on the Preparation Day before the Sabbath (Mark 15:42; Luke 23:54) which is Friday. Furthermore, the women discovered the empty tomb on the 1st day of the week (Matthew 28:1; Luke 24:1). So the traditional Friday-Sunday aligns consistently with Scripture.

Guards were guarding until the third day; Image requested by Bodie Hodge*

Furthermore, it goes back to the earliest church records too. Early Christian writers such as Ignatius and Irenaeus also understood Christ as rising on the third day while accepting the language of "three days and three nights." Their writings aren’t Scripture, but they show that early Christians didn’t necessarily understand Matthew 12:40 as demanding precisely 72 hours.

What About Wednesday Or Thursday Crucifixion That Some Suggest?

For those pushing the full three days and three nights, one must arrive at a Thursday crucifixion (others push it as far back as Wednesday, but I’ve met precious few who would  argue for that).  

The Wednesday or Thursday models are attempts to reconcile Jonah’s comparison in another way. Those pushing for a Thursday crucifixion usually try to interpret John 19:31, as having an extra Sabbath, so that you also have a second Preparation Day for that week.

They call the approaching alternate Sabbath a "high day," as referring to an additional festival Sabbath rather than simply the ordinary weekly Sabbath that fell on the Passover/Feast of Unleavened Bread festival (making it a high Sabbath or high day already).

Even so, these views attempt to provide additional nights between Christ's burial and resurrection in an attempt to have 3 full days and nights (per the comparison to Jonah) between Christ’s death and resurrection.

Such an interpretations is held by respected Christians committed to biblical authority, and the issue shouldn’t be a reason to go start anew church! Nevertheless, there are difficulties with these alternatives. Scripture never states that an additional Sabbath occurred between the crucifixion and the regular weekly Sabbath.

Image from Presentation Library

The biggest problem with this view is that Christ would have risen on the fourth day in that scenario. Moving the crucifixion earlier makes it more difficult to deal with the chronology because of the numerous passages that say that Christ rose or would rise on "the third day" (Matthew 16:21; 17:22-23; 20:18-19; 27:63-64; Mark 8:31; 9:31; 10:33-34; Luke 9:22; 13:32; 18:31-33; 24:6-7, 21, 46; John 2:19-22; Acts 10:40; 1 Corinthians 15:3-4). Consider also that Jesus, said He would raise in three days when compared to the temple’s destruction (John 2:19-22). So instead of dealing with the interpretive understanding of the Jonah passage, now you have to deal with a new understanding of a whole bunch of passages!

It’s better to use clear and repeated passages to help interpret a passage that may initially appear difficult (interpret Scripture with Scripture). Matthew 12:40 (Jonah passage) should therefore be understood alongside the many "third day" passages rather than used to overturn or reinterpret all of them.

So why is the Jonah passage the one that seems to stick out. There is an obvious reason that we haven’t discussed yet—but now it’s time!

Be Careful Of Metaphorical Language

Jesus' comparison to Jonah in Matthew 12:40 is metaphorical and functions as a simile: "For as Jonah was...so will the Son of Man be."

The point of the comparison is the correspondence between Jonah's experience and Christ's death, burial, and resurrection, not necessarily a requirement that every chronological detail be mathematically identical. Jonah was as good as dead being swallowed by a specially prepared fish. Yet he came out of watery beast and lived and preached in Nineveh.

And the scribes and Pharisees believed in the account of Jonah! They knew such a task was all too easy for God to accomplish. Yet, here they were arguing over and over with Jesus, who is God.

But take special note…the phraseology comparing Christ’s situation to Jonah’s situation is metaphorical, not literal. Thus, when we read “three days and three nights, we need to understand that this is an allegorical comparison, where the many passages about Christ raising on the third day are founded in historical narrative. So, the third day is the key to understanding Christ’s resurrection for specific timing. Again, use the clear passages for a proper understanding and let the similes be similes.  

The expression "three days and three nights" should therefore be interpreted in harmony with the much more frequent and explicit biblical expression "the third day." So they are complimentary.

Besides, Esther, similar third-day language occurs throughout historical narratives (Genesis 22:4; Genesis 42:18; Exodus 19:11, 16; Joshua 9:16-17; 1 Samuel 30:1; 2 Kings 20:5). Thus, Jesus' Jonah comparison shouldn’t be isolated from the ordinary biblical manner of counting days or from Christ's repeated declarations that He would rise "the third day" (Matthew 16:21; Luke 18:33; 24:46).

Conclusion

The third day being equivalent to the three days and three nights phraseology was a normal expression in biblical accounts when there was a three-day sequence, even when three complete 24-hour periods had not elapsed. With this in mind, the Friday crucifixion and Sunday resurrection makes the most sense biblically and can be easily defended without contradiction.

"Three days and three nights" is best understood according to biblical Jewish reckoning rather than a modern stopwatch calculation of exactly 72 hours. Most importantly, the debate over the precise number of hours shouldn’t overshadow the doctrine on which Scripture is unmistakably clear: Christ truly died, was buried, and "rose again the third day according to the Scriptures" (1 Corinthians 15:3-4, NKJV).

□

Bodie Hodge, Ken Ham's son in law, has been an apologist defending 6-day creation and opposing evolution since 1998. He spent 21 years working at Answers in Genesis as a speaker, writer, and researcher as well as a founding news anchor for Answers News. He was also head of the Oversight Council.  

Bodie launched Biblical Authority Ministries in 2015 as a personal website and it was organized officially in 2025 as a 501(c)(3). He has spoken on multiple continents and hosts of US states in churches, colleges, and universities. He is married with four children.

Mr. Hodge earned a Bachelor and Master of Science degrees from Southern Illinois University at Carbondale (SIUC). Then he taught at SIUC for a couple of years as a Visiting Instructor teaching all levels of undergraduate engineering and running a materials lab and a CAD lab. He did research on advanced ceramic materials to develop a new method of production of titanium diboride with a grant from Lockheed Martin. He worked as a Test Engineer for Caterpillar, Inc., prior to entering full-time ministry.

His love of science was coupled with a love of history, philosophy, and theology. For about one year of his life, Bodie was editing and updating a theological, historical, and scientific dictionary/encyclopedia. Mr. Hodge has over 25 years of experience in writing, speaking and researching in these fields.

*Image by generative program as requested by Bodie Hodge

 



[1] I’ve commented on this before with my colleague and brother in Christ, Paul Taylor: Was Jesus In The Grave For Three Days And Three Nights? Paul Taylor and Bodie Hodge, Biblical Authority Ministries, April 19, 2025, https://www.biblicalauthorityministries.org/2025/04/was-jesus-in-grave-for-three-days-and.html; Paul Taylor and Bodie Hodge, A Matter of Days, Biblical Authority Ministries, March 20, 2026, https://www.biblicalauthorityministries.org/2026/03/a-matter-of-days.html;

Monday, October 5, 2026

The Islamic Dilemma

The Islamic Dilemma

Bodie Hodge, M.Sc., B.Sc., PEI

Biblical Authority Ministries, October 5, 2026 (Donate)

Islam is the largest cult of Christianity in the world.[1] Some try to list it as a world religion, and I understand this distinction. But it is technically a cult that has deviated from biblical teaching and changed the nature of Christ, added alleged “new Scripture” (e.g., the Qur’an/Koran and authentic Hadiths) and deviated on who God is, while paying lip service to the Bible.

Where some Christian cults openly change the Bible (to their detriment) to conform to their “new” theology (e.g., the New World Translation or the Joseph Smith Translation) while adding their alleged “new Scriptures” (e.g., Watchtower publications, Studies in the Scriptures, Book of Mormon, Pearl of Great Price, and Doctrines and Covenants), those in Islam affirm the Bible is true without changes. 

Qur’an, Surah 4:136 O ye who believe! Believe in God and His Apostle, and the Book which He hath sent down to His Apostle, and the Books which He hath sent down aforetime. Whoever believeth not on God and His Angels and His Books and His apostles, and in the Last Day, he verily hath erred with far-gone error. 

The Qur’an repeatedly affirms that biblical texts are the Word of God and thus true in its chapters that are also called Surahs or Suras (e.g., Qur’an 2:40-42,126,136,285; 3:3-4,71,93; 4:47,136, 163; 5:43-51, 66-72; 6:91; 10:37,94; 17:55; 21:7, 105; 29:45-46; 35:31; and 46:11.

The Bible is the collection of books sent down aforetime; Image requested by Bodie Hodge*

This suddenly causes a big problem because the teaching in the Islamic new Scriptures—the Qur’an/Koran—contradict the Bible in many places. In other words, it places the Qur’an (and thus Islam) on two horns of a dilemma. Thus, the famous Islamic Dilemma arises:

·       If the Qur’an is true when it affirms the truth of the Bible, then the Qur’an is false because the Bible contradicts it.

·       If the Qur’an is false when it affirms the truth of the Bible, then the Qur’an is false.

On both horns of this dilemma, the Qur’an is false. Note the devastation of this argument. This isn’t a new argument but has brought for ages. And when Muslims fully grasp this dilemma, they must, if they truly wish to follow God, question the Qur’an. I’ve discussed this dilemma before but this time I wanted to draw it out in detail.[2]

The Islamic Dilemma Response

Many Muslims aren’t taught the devastation of this argument. And if they are taught about the Islamic Dilemma, then they are likely told the solution is to say what certain Muslim scholars say, that “the Bible has been corrupted”. For the astute person, this now causes even more problems! Let me explain.

First, it means that the professing Muslim isn’t a Muslim because they disagree with the Qur’an which says the Bible in Muhammad’s day was true. We have thousands of ancient manuscripts of the New Testament affirming it is the same today. And the Dead Sea Scrolls, Church father quotes, and ancient copies and ancient translations are an amazing confirmation that the Old Testament has been preserved. The Bible we have today is the same as the Bible in Muhammad’s day and is the same as about 2,000 years ago.

So, it should be pointed out a professing Muslim isn’t a Muslim when switch and don’t follow the Qur’an or what Muhammad said. If the professing Muslim will openly disagree with the Qur’an, while professing it is true, then there is a big problem for that person—they have dilemma of their own if they realize it!

Furthermore, the Qur’an says that no one can change the Word of God (Qur’an in Surah 6:34; 10:34).[3] Since the Bible is the Word of God according to the Koran, then it can’t be changed. So again, they are arguing the Qur’an is wrong. See how the problem just keeps getting deeper when someone holds to the position that the Bible has been corrupted?

Note something else, when a professing Muslim takes the position that the Bible has been corrupted, they no longer hold to the Qur’an or Muhammad as being authoritative. Did you catch that? So the logical question to ask what authority have they replaced the Qur’an and Muhammad with?

It was Islamic scholars. It was men! Of course, these scholars do attempt to garner support from the Qur’an but it also fails. Apologist Sam Shamoun points out that Quranic passages commonly used to support corruption claims actually refer to people twisting, concealing, or misinterpreting Scripture rather than rewriting and corrupting the biblical text.[4] Former Muslim turned Christian, Daniel Shayesteh writes:

“The Qur’an itself confirms and defends the Bible, as it existed in the seventh century, as the Word of God.”[5]

When a professing Muslim holds to the position of these men who agree that the Qur’an isn’t accurate with its straightforward declarations about the Bible, they have elevated them to the position of being the supreme authority on the issue. Now, whenever man is elevated to that position, it is called “humanism”.

The Muslim, in an effort to dismiss the Bible, must appeal to fallible, sinful man as a supreme authority to supersede the Bible (and the Qur’an)—this is humanism. The Muslim is no longer a Muslim but a humanist when they do this. They have essentially jumped religions.

A true Muslim must acknowledge the Bible is true from its first to the its last verse, and must conform to it, as the Qur’an says. They should be defending the truth of the Bible, if they want to be consistent with the Qur’an. The problem then comes when the professing Muslim look back at the Qur’an from the perspective of the Bible being true: the Qur’an can’t be true then.

Again, either way you look at it, the Qur’an isn’t true and if one tries to salvage the Qur’an by appealing to the scholars (man) as the greatest authority—you’ve given up Qur’an in even more places and appealed to the religion of humanism to do so! It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know that man can err and humanism is full of errors and contradictions.

So, what’s left after all this? The Bible. The Bible is true regardless of the Qur’an. It was true before Muhammad and is to this day. The Bible is the absolute truth because it is the revelation from an absolutely true God.

If a professing Muslim isn’t following the Bible and defending it, then they aren’t a true Muslim because they are openly affirming that the Qur’an and Muhammad were false. Let’s look more closely at the Islamic Dilemma and the biblical divisions to understand this better.

Biblical Divisions

The Qur’an doesn’t simply acknowledge that God once gave revelations that subsequently disappeared or were corrupted. Instead, it repeatedly speaks positively about the book (the Bible), Torah, the writings associated with the prophets, the Psalms, and the Gospel, while claiming that the Qur’an confirms these previous revelations.[6] Before I go any further, let me explain these divisions further.

The Torah is also called the Pentateuch or the Law of Moses—it is the first five books of the Bible (Genesis, Exodus, Numbers, Leviticus, and Deuteronomy). The Torah makes up the foundational aspect of the Bible.

There are three division of the Old Testament—the Law/Torah/Pentateuch, the Psalms/writings (Psalms, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon) and the Prophets. Jesus appealed to all three of these divisions as authoritative

Then He said to them, “These are the words which I spoke to you while I was still with you, that all things must be fulfilled which were written in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms concerning Me.” (Luke 24:44, NKJV)

The Gospel [or Injil/Injeel (the Islamic name)] is the New Testament. The Gospel is broken into two parts—the historical accounts of the Gospel and then the explanation of the Gospel. The four Gospel accounts (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John) and the book of Acts make up the historical aspects of the Gospel and its initial historical expansion. The second part is the explanation of the Gospel which consists of the epistles to churches explaining the Gospel in sufficient detail.

So, the Bible is broken into four parts: The Torah, The Prophets, the Psalms/Writings and the Gospel (New Testament). The Koran appeals to all four as authoritative.

Islamic Dilemma

The Torah and the Gospel

Qur’an 5:43-48 (se also Qur’an 7:157) refers Jews and Christians to their respective Scriptures—the Old and New Testaments. The Qur’an tells the people of the Gospel (i.e., Christians) to judge according to what Allah revealed in it based on our Christian Scriptures (5:47).[7]

This command is presented in a context addressing Jews and Christians and their Scriptures. Qur’an 5:66 and 5:68 likewise say that the People of the Book (i.e., the Bible[8]) should observe the Torah and Gospel. Such commands would be difficult to explain if the Torah and Gospel available in Muhammad's time had already become textually unreliable.[9] Robert Morey also points out this dilemma as terrible problem for the Muslim.[10]  

 

This is one aspect of the Islamic Dilemma because the Qur’an teaches that the earlier Scriptures are true. This goes for both the Torah and the Gospel (but the others as well). The argument becomes powerful because the Qur’an speaks of the Torah and Gospel as Scriptures still available during Muhammad's lifetime. Former Muslim turned Christian Sam Shamoun argued that this makes no sense if those previous Scriptures had already been textually corrupted and could no longer be trustworthy.[11] Ankerberg and Weldon point out:

“If Allah does not contradict himself, then everything that has purportedly ‘come down from him’ (the Bible and the Quran) must be in agreement. The Muslim must believe in the doctrinal unity of the books of Allah—the Bible as originally given and the Quran. But we have just seen they conflict. Muslims counter this by asserting that the Bible’s text has been corrupted, but without supplying any credible evidence to back their claims.”[12]

So, if the Torah and Gospel were available and authoritative in Muhammad's day then they were indeed preserved, true, revelations from God—even from the Islamic perspective. Thus, the biblical teachings should be accepted and defended by the professing Muslim.

Yet the Bible contradicts major Quranic teachings. The New Testament teaches that Jesus is the Son of God, was crucified, died for sins, and rose from the dead. Meanwhile, the Qur’an denies Jesus' crucifixion (Qur’an 4:157). Therefore, if the Bible is preserved and true, the Qur’an contradicts Scriptures that it claims to confirm—therefore, the Qur’an is false.[13]

Also, Qur’an 5:43 asks why the Jews were coming to Muhammad for judgment when "they have the Torah," which contains God's judgment. Qur’an 5:44 says that the prophets judged the Jews according to the Torah. Thus, according to Shamoun's argument, the Qur’an speaks of the Torah as an authoritative Scripture actually possessed by Jews in Muhammad's time, not merely as a lost book once given to Moses. See also Qur’an 3:3-4; 5:43-45.[14]

Muslim apologists dispute this argument, especially whether the Qur’an actually confirms the canonical Old and New Testaments rather than merely the original Torah and Gospel revelations. Thus, the central debate is over what Scriptures the Qur’an is actually affirming and whether those Scriptures had been textually corrupted by Muhammad's time. Nevertheless, Muhammad didn’t think so, and the textual support from ancient manuscripts show the Bible hasn’t been corrupted.

The Psalms

The Qur’an specifically recognizes the Psalms, or Zabur, given to David. Koran 4:163 states,

"to David We gave the Psalms"[15]

Qur’an 17:55 repeats that the Zabur was given to David. Qur’an 21:105 even appeals to something written in the Psalms concerning the righteous inheriting the earth. Therefore, the Qur’an's affirmation of earlier revelation extends beyond the Torah and Gospel to David and the Psalms.[16] It this generally the book of Psalms—which is largely the work of David, but others as well, or is it for the general Psalms/writings, which include the book of Psalms? Regardless, when “the book”, which is the Bible, is in reference, it includes all these canonical books.

The Prophets

The Qur’an also recognizes revelation associated with the biblical prophets. Muhammad believed himself to be in the same category. Although Christians would dispute this on biblical grounds as the Revelation from God in the 1st Century was sufficient once for all (Jude 1:3). And the gift of prophecy was sealed up after the New Testament was written.

Qur’an 2:136 commands belief in what was given to Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, Jesus, and "the prophets." Qur’an 4:163 similarly refers to revelation given to Noah, Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac, Jacob, Jesus, Job, Jonah, Aaron, Solomon, and David.

Qur’an 5:44 says that the prophets themselves judged according to the Torah. Thus, the Koran places itself within a claimed succession of earlier prophetic revelation rather than presenting all previous revelation as unavailable or unusable.[17]

The Dilemma Restated

Apologist Ron Rhodes writes:

“Muslims face a dilemma when dealing with the Christian Bible. According to the Quran, believers in Allah are not supposed to reject any of Allah’s Scriptures. If they obey the Quran, they are forbidden from accepting only a part of Allah’s revelation to mankind (a revelation that includes the Bible)—see Sura 4:136). Muslims are even commanded to consult the Hebrew and Greek Scriptures for confirmation of Muhammad’s revelations (Surah 10:94). However, if they accept what the Bible teaches—including such doctrines as Jesus being the Son of God, Jesus being God in human flesh, God being a Trinity, salvation being by faith in Christ, and so forth—then they must reject what the Quran teaches. In that case, they would no longer be Muslims.”[18] (emphasis in original)

The repeated affirmations of the Bible being truth in the Koran, leaves the Muslim with an insurmountable problem. If the Torah, Prophets, Psalms, and Gospel (e.g., the Bible) available in Muhammad's time were substantially preserved and true revelation from God, then their teachings are absolute and 100% true according to the Qur’an.

The Qur’an has major contradictions, especially concerning the identity, crucifixion, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ. But if those Scriptures had already been textually corrupted and were false, then the Qur’an's repeated assurance of them, description of them as "guidance and light," make the Koran wrong from that angle. So it is a no-win scenario for the Qur'an. 

If the previous Scriptures (i.e., the Bible) were preserved and true, the Qur’an contradicts Scriptures it claims to confirm, thus the Qur’an is false..

If the previous Scriptures were already corrupted, the Qur’an appears to affirm and direct people toward corrupted Scriptures, thus the Qur’an is false.

Naturally, Muslim apologists dispute this argument, particularly by maintaining that the Qur’an affirms the original revelations given to Moses, David, Jesus, and the prophets rather than necessarily endorsing the entire biblical canon as it existed in Muhammad's time. But this doesn’t hold up as a valid excuse. Shamoun points out that Qur’an 5:43-48 and 5:68 speak of Scriptures actually possessed and used by Jews and Christians—which is the whole of Scripture.[19]

When the dust settles, the Bible is true any way you look at it. The Qur’an is false any way you look at it. The Islamic Dilemma is devastating when properly understood—but only for the Muslim, whom we invite to stand on the authority of the Bible and consider the claims of the true Christ in the Bible and His death, burial, and resurrection. It has eternal consequences in either heaven or hell. If you want to be obedient to God, then you need to read and follow the Bible.  

□

Bodie Hodge, Ken Ham's son in law, has been an apologist defending 6-day creation and opposing evolution since 1998. He spent 21 years working at Answers in Genesis as a speaker, writer, and researcher as well as a founding news anchor for Answers News. He was also head of the Oversight Council.  

Bodie launched Biblical Authority Ministries in 2015 as a personal website and it was organized officially in 2025 as a 501(c)(3). He has spoken on multiple continents and hosts of US states in churches, colleges, and universities. He is married with four children.

Mr. Hodge earned a Bachelor and Master of Science degrees from Southern Illinois University at Carbondale (SIUC). Then he taught at SIUC for a couple of years as a Visiting Instructor teaching all levels of undergraduate engineering and running a materials lab and a CAD lab. He did research on advanced ceramic materials to develop a new method of production of titanium diboride with a grant from Lockheed Martin. He worked as a Test Engineer for Caterpillar, Inc., prior to entering full-time ministry.

His love of science was coupled with a love of history, philosophy, and theology. For about one year of his life, Bodie was editing and updating a theological, historical, and scientific dictionary/encyclopedia. Mr. Hodge has over 25 years of experience in writing, speaking and researching in these fields.

*Image by generative program as requested by Bodie Hodge



[1] Bodie Hodge and Roger Patterson (gen. eds. and co-authors), World Religions and Cults, Volume 1, Chapter 6, Master Books, Green Forest, AR, 2015, pp. 141-162.

[2] Ibid; Bodie Hodge and Roger Patterson (gen. eds.), World Religions and Cults, Appendix A [The Bible Versus Other Alleged Holy Books—Bodie Hodge], Master Books, Green Forest, AR, 2016, pp. 259-277.

[3] Interestingly, the Qur’an says that its words have been changed! See Qur’an, Surahs 2:106; 15:90-91; 16:101.

[4] Sam Shamoun, "Tawraat (Torah) and Injeel (Gospel) Are Not Changed: So Say Muslim Sources," Answering Islam, accessed October 2, 2026; Sam Shamoun, "The Incorruptibility of Allah's Words and the Charge of Biblical Corruption," Answering Islam, accessed October 2, 2026.

[5] Daniel Shayesteh, The Difference Is The Son, Castle Hill, NSW, Australia, 2004, p. 92.

[6] Sam Shamoun, "The Qur’an on Biblical Authority Revisited," Answering Islam, accessed October 2, 2026.

[7] Sam Shamoun, "The Challenge of the Qur’an & Its Implications for the Muslim Corruption Charges," Answering Islam, accessed October 2, 2026.

[8] Bible literally means “the book”.

[9] Sam Shamoun, "Revisiting the Issue of What the Qur’an Says about the Torah Again!," Answering Islam, accessed October 2, 2026; Sam Shamoun, "Salvation According to Christianity and Islam," Answering Islam, accessed October 2, 2026.

[10] Robert Morey, The Islamic Invasion, Christian Scholars Press, Las Vegas, NV, 1960-1977, pp. 133-137.

[11] Sam Shamoun, "The Qur’an Confirms—The Two Testaments of the Holy Bible Are the Torah and Injil!" Answering Islam, accessed October 2, 2026.’

[12] John Ankerberg and John Weldon, Fast Facts On Islam, Harvest House Publishers, Eugene, OR, 2001, p. 40.

[13] Sam Shamoun, "The Challenge of the Qur’an & Its Implications for the Muslim Corruption Charges," Answering Islam, accessed October 2, 2026.

[14] Sam Shamoun, "The Qur’an Confirms the Bible Has Never Been Corrupted, Part 1," Answering Islam, accessed October 2, 2026; Sam Shamoun, "The Qur’an Confirms: The Two Testaments of the Holy Bible Are the Torah and Injil!," Answering Islam, accessed October 2, 2026.

[15] Note the plural “We”.

[16] Sam Shamoun, "The Qur’an on Biblical Authority Revisited," Answering Islam, accessed October 2, 2026.

[17] Sam Shamoun, "Salvation According to Christianity and Islam," Answering Islam, accessed October 2, 2026; Sam Shamoun, "The Qur’an on Biblical Authority Revisited," Answering Islam, accessed October 2, 2026.

[18] Ron Rhodes, Reasoning from the Scriptures with Muslims, Harvest House Publishers, Eugene, OR, 2002, p. 185.

[19] Sam Shamoun, "The Qur’an's View of the Holy Bible Revisited, Part 1," Answering Islam, accessed October 2, 2026; Sam Shamoun, "The Qur’an Confirms the Bible Has Never Been Corrupted, Part 2," Answering Islam, accessed October 2, 2026.

What Spices Were Used In Jesus' Burial?

What Spices Were Used In Jesus' Burial? Bodie Hodge, M.Sc., B.Sc., PEI Biblical Authority Ministries, October 9, 2026 ( Donate ) W...