Pre-1776 Legal Christian Documents In England And The Colonies

Pre-1776 Legal Christian Documents In England And The Colonies

Bodie Hodge, M.Sc., B.Sc., PEI

Biblical Authority Ministries, November 14, 2025 (Donate)

The United States, prior to being their own fledgling nation, was part of British Empire. The colonials came largely from England and few places within Christianized Europe.  

The USA Was Born Out Of A Christian Nation

From the 1600s to 1776, the colonies were Christian in their outlook, governance, and daily life. Christianity permeated the entire culture. This was in the days prior to Charles Darwin when the religion of secular humanism began taking over in the latter part of the 1800s in England.

King John signing the Magna Carta AD 1215; Image requested by Bodie Hodge (Chat GPT)

Prior to 1776, documents like the Magna Carta or the Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion were in force as legal documents. With this in mind, it shows that the United States started with an immersion of Christian worldview in every area of society.

What was the Magna Carta and other religious and political documents of the time? Let’s evaluate these in more detail to show the heavy Christian roots even prior to the founding of the nation.

The Legal Christian Documents

The United States won their independence from England and later called the United Kingdom. England (technically the Kingdom of Great Britain at the time the United States became independent) was unmistakably a Christian nation, especially in its Anglican denominational identity post-Reformation. This can be shown by several foundational legal documents.

Magna Carta Of AD 1215

The Magna Carta arose in 1215 when King John’s heavy taxation military failures, and arbitrary and changing rules pushed English land owners (lords/barons) to rebellion. Yes, this is the same King John in Robin Hood shows!

English landlords demanded that the king recognize ancient God-given rights and limit his power under law. Negotiations at Runnymede—a rural area next to the Thames River in Surrey, England—resulted in a charter that bound the king to legal restraints, protected the English Church, and secured rights for nobles and, indirectly, free men. It was essentially a peace treaty that became a foundational document for constitutional government that has influenced the entire Western World.

The Magna Carta (originally in 1215, reaffirmed in 1225) begins with the explicit declaration that the English Church shall be free, placing the realm under God and recognizing the Christian Church as a protected and central institution within English law. A few blatantly Christian quotes are:

1. “First, we have granted to God, and by this present charter have confirmed for us and our heirs forever, that the English Church shall be free, and shall have its rights undiminished and its liberties unimpaired.”

2. “The English Church shall be free, and shall have its rights undiminished, and its liberties unimpaired.”

3. “We have granted and given to God, and by this present charter have confirmed, for us and our heirs forever, the freedom of the Church of England and all its rights and liberties.”

4. “We have granted to the archbishop of Canterbury, primate of all England, and to the bishops and clergy of our kingdom, all their accustomed liberties.”

5. “The Church of England shall enjoy all its ancient liberties free and unhurt.”

Bear in mind that this is prior to the Reformation and the official organization of the Church of England (Anglican Church).

The Acts of Uniformity Of 1559

The Acts of Uniformity, particularly those of 1559 and 1662, mandated Anglican worship throughout the nation by requiring the use of the Book of Common Prayer, enforcing attendance at Anglican services, and binding ministers, educators, and many public officials to affirm Anglican doctrine.

Of course, this caused tension with other denominations coming out of the Reformation like the Reformed or Puritans—many of whom later fled to the colonies due to heavy persecution. Even so, these sources show clearly that England’s government, monarchy, and public life were legally and structurally Christian (a particular denomination of Christianity) at the time the United States emerged as an independent nation.

At the founding of the US, there was never a question about the freedom and intertwinement of Christianity in politics. It was how to navigate a key difference from that of England. How to be Christian (with Bibles and Law) without imposing one denominational view on all citizens. England imposed Anglicanism and persecuted those who weren’t, even if they were orthodox in their biblical view (unlike Rome’s deviation from Scripture).

Thirty-Nine Articles Of Religion (1571)

Doctrinal standards such as the Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion (1571) shaped the nation at a deeper level. While designed for the Church of England, the Articles influenced universities, clergy licensing, education, and the expectations for many public officials.

Grand Church buildings blanket the United Kingdom many with ancient roots; Phot by Bodie Hodge

Parliament required conformity to these Christian doctrines in various capacities, making the Articles a kind of national theological framework.

The Test Acts Of 1673

Beyond the monarchy, Parliament (House of Lords and House of Commons) and public office were also tied to Christianity. The Test Acts of 1673 and 1678 required anyone serving in civil or military office, including members of Parliament, to take the Lord’s Supper according to Anglican practice and publicly reject Catholic doctrines.

Parliamentary oaths reinforced this requirement by including affirmations such as “upon the true faith of a Christian.” These measures meant that service in the House of Commons or House of Lords required explicit Christian profession.

The Coronation Oath Act Of 1688

The Coronation Oath Act of 1688 required every monarch to vow before God to maintain the laws of God, uphold the true profession of the Gospel, and defend the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law. This made the Christian (specifically Anglican) faith a constitutional requirement for the head of state, who also served as the Supreme Governor of the Church of England.

This is why the King or Queen of England—to this day—is the head of the Anglican Church.

During Queen Elizabeth II's reign she headed the Church of England. In her passing, King Charles, her son, ascended to those duties over the Church of England. Public Domain image.

Bill of Rights Of 1689

England’s identity as a Christian nation was reinforced by several major documents that shaped its monarchy, Parliament, and civil order. The Bill of Rights of 1689 required that the monarch be Protestant and barred Catholics from the throne, embedding Protestant Christianity directly into the constitutional structure.

This made the Christian faith a prerequisite for national leadership and was intended to secure the nation’s stability through adherence to the Protestant religion. This Bill of Rights also protected people from excessive bail and cruel punishments. One can easily see how this document had influenced the US Constitutional Bill of Rights, even though they are very different documents.

The Act of Settlement Of 1701

The Act of Settlement of 1701 strengthened this by insisting that the monarch must profess the Protestant faith, remain in communion with the Church of England, and pass the crown only to Protestant heirs. This is why some heirs of the past were overlooked because they were not Protestant.

Since the King or Queen serves as the Supreme Governor of the Church of England, this act ensured that the nation itself remained aligned with Protestant Anglican Christianity in both governance and religious identity. Together, these acts placed the Christian faith at the core of the English constitution.

Conclusion

Collectively, these sources show that England was constitutionally, culturally, and politically a Christian nation during the period when the United States was founded. This meant that the colonies were also under that same influence. Even though some suggest that the United States was formed as a secular nation (e.g., the religion of secular humanism), remedial research shows the opposite was the case.

□

Bodie Hodge, Ken Ham's son in law, has been an apologist since 1998 helping out in various churches and running an apologetics website. He spent 21 years working at Answers in Genesis as a speaker, writer, and researcher as well as a founding news anchor for Answers News. He was also head of the Oversight Council. 

Bodie launched Biblical Authority Ministries in 2015 as a personal website and it was organized officially in 2025 as a 501(c)(3). He has spoken on multiple continents and hosts of US states in churches, colleges, and universities. He is married with four children.

 

 

 

 

 

Ten Years Now

Ten Years Now

Bodie Hodge, M.Sc., B.Sc., PEI

Biblical Authority Ministries, November 13, 2025 (Donate)

August of 2015, I started Biblical Authority Ministries as a personal side blog. Three months later, I struggled to live. This week marks the 10-year and 2-year anniversary of two events that happened on the same day, to the same hour intriguingly, 8 years apart.

Heart Attack

I’ve almost died a host of ways, but 10 years ago, I suffered a massive days-long heart attack with severe back pain that radiated. By the time I got help from this 100% blockage in the widow maker, the damage was done. Sections of my heart were dead tissue with a low ejection fraction and defibrillator was later installed. 

I was now a “bionic man”, but it was to help keep me alive instead of giving me super strength. I found in my situation that being physically fit doesn't stop you from having a heart attack, but helps you survive longer to get help (due to collateral flow). 

Bodie and Renee back when we had hair!

My doctor at the time (he has since passed) told me I had “a 20% chance of dying each year due to the damage”. I knew what that meant and said, “that means 5 years”. He looked me straight in the eye and said he didn’t expect me to live for five more years. It was “disheartening” (pun intended!).

I remember the 5^th year anniversary of surviving. I was surprised I made it that far. Now with a 10-year anniversary, I’m just as surprised. I’ve had many ups and downs—a second 100% widow maker blockage again (a blood clot this time, but no new damage) with back pain radiating again and a 90% blockage with back pain radiating. How I’ve survived is only by the will of God.

Bodie and Renee

I went from doing 130 pushups as a set, running, and being very active, to a much slower and weaker pace. On the outside people often misjudge me thinking I’m in great shape but internally it’s like tornado damage. It’s hard to believe the incredible physical decline due to heart damage. Hosts of physical problems follow and you simply can’t do things like you used to—it is much more difficult and things don’t even work like they should—its rather frustrating.  

Cancer

Eight years later to the day, my wife Renee found out that she had cancer at precisely the same hour my heart pains in the back started. And so began a two-year battle (that still has ongoing repercussions). Our family has been destroyed with horrible diseases like cancer and heart disease.

Renee with our girlies

Words can’t describe the pain, particularly the mental and physical anguish, we suffer. Seeing my wife undergo what she went through was terrible, and yet, she had to go through it. She’s tried to be as natural as possible while not neglecting proper medical procedures and treatment. Her wisdom navigating this area and keeping a balance between these types of treatments are amazing.

Renee on one of our many hikes; (Yes, I'm putting up happy pictures and not the ones with all the agony!)

Cancer treatments literally take you to the brink of death—twice. It is horrible to see and for her it was atrocious to go through. Even thinking about it sets off horrible emotional scars. Even with insurance, our conditions and ongoing treatments still leave us with medical bills that we struggle to handle.

In Light Of Scripture

We love Jesus Christ. He is perfect in every way and my wife and I are fallible sinners who cast our every issue on God’s grace and mercy—even our broken bodies.

God, in His infinite wisdom and power, made a perfect world without sin, death, disease, or suffering (e.g., Genesis 1:31, Deuteronomy 32:4). Due to man’s sin the Garden of Eden, Adam and Eve fell. God cursed the ground and the animals and sentenced man to die (Genesis 3).

In just the 3^rd chapter in the Bible, it explains the broken world in which we live. Heart attacks, cancer, and hosts of other diseases are now a reality. We are going to die because we are all sinners and yet God loved us enough to rescue us.

The Fam!

But Christ, who is God, stepped into history and took on flesh and became a man. He lived a perfect life committing no sin. We fall short on a daily basis. In His perfection, He was put to death—the death on a Cross—due to false accusations to less. His death dwarfs heart attacks and cancer in the excruciating and shameful way He was publicly put to death.

Even the word excruciating comes from the same root of the word crucify. In His death, Christ was the final sacrifice which was occurring since the Garden of Eden and the first sacrifice in Genesis 3:21. His infinite nature and infinite power as the Son of God satisfied the infinite wrath of God the Father. Thus, Christ became a substitute on our behalf.

When we receive Christ as Lord and Savior and believe on His name, His perfect righteousness is transferred (or technically “imputed”) to us. We are now seen as spotless as Christ because His righteousness is now our righteousness. Only in Christ can we have eternal life in Heaven with God through His shed blood and resurrection.

Empty Grave; Image requested by Bodie Hodge (ChatGPT)

So, although we suffer heart attacks, cancer and other horrible types of things, our hope is in Christ and no other. If you’ve suffered, which you surely have, please consider reading this article that explains the good news of Jesus Christ in more detail. And please keep us in your prayers from time to time.

To God be the glory and praise!

□

Bodie Hodge, Ken Ham's son in law, has been an apologist since 1998 helping out in various churches and running an apologetics website. He spent 21 years working at Answers in Genesis as a speaker, writer, and researcher as well as a founding news anchor for Answers News. He was also head of the Oversight Council. 

Bodie launched Biblical Authority Ministries in 2015 as a personal website and it was organized officially in 2025 as a 501(c)(3). He has spoken on multiple continents and hosts of US states in churches, colleges, and universities. He is married with four children.

 

Doctrinal Confessions Of Faith (After The Reformation)

Doctrinal Confessions Of Faith (After The Reformation)

Bodie Hodge, M.Sc., B.Sc., PEI

Biblical Authority Ministries, November 12, 2025 (Donate)

Introduction

In today’s church and ministry culture, Statements of Faith abound—and this is a good thing! They often declare doctrinal positions (e.g., Triune God, etc.).

At the time of the Reformation, all these new Church groups came out and did something similar but in much more detail. They did “Confessions of Faith”. These often dwarf our little Statements of Faith and give details to their biblical positions they took as newly formed denominations. Obviously, not all denominations agreed on all points. There are reasons for this--sometimes the Bible gives freedom, others focus on specific doctrines where others didn’t, or certain specifics like Calvinism vs. Arminianism, eschatologies, and modes of baptism often varied.

Church buildings in Germany exploded after the Reformation; Image requested by Bodie Hodge (ChatGPT)

There were quite a few Confessions that came out of the Reformation. There were four major groups that came out of the Reformation—Lutherans, Puritans (Reformed, Baptists, and Presbyterians), Anglicans (Church of England, Methodists, Wesleyan, etc.), and then finally, the Anabaptists (Amish, Mennonites, etc.). From these, hosts of smaller denominations grew and split over time.

The Importance Of Confessions Of Faith After The Reformation

Following the Reformation, it was vital for emerging Protestant groups to produce clear Confessions of Faith because the movement had fractured centuries of unified (though corrupted) church authority. The Roman Catholic Church had long provided a single framework of doctrine and tradition.

When reformers broke away, they needed written statements to define what they believed—clarifying their theology, uniting their congregations, and distinguishing themselves from both Rome and from each other.

These Confessions served as public declarations of orthodoxy grounded in Scripture rather than church hierarchy. They defended Reformation teachings such as sola Scriptura (Scripture alone), sola fide (faith alone), and the priesthood of all believers. In an era of theological turmoil and political tension, Confessions provided stability and coherence, ensuring that local churches shared a common understanding of salvation, the sacraments, and the nature of God.

It also showed they held to the major doctrines of Christendom and were not deviating into cults and false doctrines. This also protected and shielded the faithful from false teachers [who may have tried to creep in] and helped new believers understand biblical truth systematically.

Politically, written Confessions were essential for gaining legal recognition and protection. Governments demanded to know what these new Protestant bodies actually believed, and Confessions gave them a formal, reasoned answer. Documents like the Augsburg Confession demonstrated that Lutherans were not anarchists but loyal citizens with deeply biblical convictions.

Spiritually, these Confessions nurtured unity, discipleship, and accountability within the church. Catechisms (brief sections to memorize) derived from them—such as the Heidelberg or Westminster—trained families and congregations in the essentials of the faith. They were not merely doctrinal checklists but devotional and educational tools meant to guide believers into a deeper, scriptural understanding of God’s truth.

In short, Confessions of Faith were indispensable in the Reformation’s aftermath because they clarified doctrine, preserved unity, resisted heresy, instructed believers, and testified publicly to biblical Christianity. They became both a theological compass and a historical record of faith grounded in the authority of God’s Word.

Major Confessions of the Reformation

Luther’s 95 Theses (1517)

Martin Luther’s Ninety-Five Theses were written in Wittenberg, Germany, and publicly posted on October 31, 1517 on the door of the church on All Hallows Eve (the day before All Saints Day—a huge festival that drew the masses into church). The church door was like the “bulletin board” of that day.

Intended as academic debate points, they primarily protested the sale of indulgences and other abuses while discussing the corruption within the Roman Catholic Church. The document rejected the notion that forgiveness could be purchased and emphasized repentance and faith in Christ alone.

95 Theses on the door at Wittenberg, Germany on All Hallows Eve; Image requested by Bodie Hodge (ChatGPT)

Though Luther did not initially seek to separate from Rome but call Rome back to Scripture, the theses ignited widespread controversy and are often regarded as the spark of the Protestant Reformation. Their publication led to further theological upheaval, the spread of Reformation ideas through the printing press, and the birth of the Lutheran movement.

Augsburg Confession (1530)

The Augsburg Confession was presented on June 25, 1530, to Emperor Charles V at the Diet of Augsburg by the Lutheran princes of Germany. A Diet is a formal assembly to deliberate something, like an official conference today. Written primarily by Philipp Melanchthon, it summarized the core beliefs of Lutheranism, including justification by faith alone, the authority of Scripture, and the proper use of sacraments.

Its aim was to demonstrate that Lutherans were not heretics but faithful Christians standing in biblical continuity with the ancient Church. The document became the central Confession of the Lutheran Church and remains foundational in Lutheran theology and ecumenical dialogues to this day.

Geneva Confession (1536)

The Geneva Confession, written by John Calvin and Guillaume Farel in 1536, articulated the emerging Reformed Puritan (Calvinist) faith in Geneva, Switzerland. Created as a statement of faith for citizens of the newly reformed city, it emphasized the sovereignty of God, the authority of Scripture, the depravity of man, and salvation by grace through faith.

It also rejected the abuses of the medieval Roman church and sought to organize worship and moral order around biblical principles. The Confession helped solidify Geneva’s identity as a Reformed stronghold and served as a model for later Calvinist Confessions throughout Europe.

Belgic Confession (1561)

Composed in 1561 by Guido de Brès, a Reformed pastor in the Netherlands, the Belgic Confession was written to explain and defend the faith of persecuted Protestants under Spanish Catholic rule. It affirmed the authority of Scripture, the nature of the Trinity, election, justification, and the marks of the true Church.

De Brès presented it to the Spanish authorities, declaring the Reformed believers’ loyalty to the government but steadfast devotion to biblical truth. It later became one of the “Three Forms of Unity” alongside the Heidelberg Catechism and Canons of Dort, and remains a cornerstone of Dutch Reformed theology.

Scots Confession (1560)

Drafted by John Knox and five other Scottish reformers known as “The Six Johns,” the Scots Confession was completed in just four days in 1560. Adopted by the Scottish Parliament, it marked the official establishment of the Reformed Church of Scotland.

It flatly rejected papal authority, upheld the Bible as the supreme authority of faith, and outlined doctrines such as predestination, justification by faith, and Christ’s headship over the Church. Its adoption effectively replaced Roman Catholicism in Scotland and set the groundwork for Presbyterianism worldwide.

Canons of Dort (1618–1619)

The Canons of Dort were the result of the Synod of Dort, convened in the Netherlands between 1618 and 1619 to settle a controversy between Calvinists and followers of Jacob Arminius. The Arminians (or Remonstrants) emphasized human free will in salvation, while the Calvinists stressed divine sovereignty.

The Synod rejected the five points of Arminianism (Remonstrants) and produced five doctrinal points later summarized in the acronym TULIP: Total depravity, Unconditional election, Limited atonement, Irresistible grace, and Perseverance of the saints. The Canons became one of the Three Forms of Unity and remain a defining statement of Reformed orthodoxy.

Heidelberg Catechism (1563)

Commissioned by Elector Frederick III of the Palatinate of the Rhine (in Germany) and authored primarily by Zacharias Ursinus and Caspar Olevianus, the Heidelberg Catechism was published in 1563 to teach Reformed doctrine in a personal, pastoral format.

Structured as 129 questions and answers, it is known for its warmth, beginning with the question, “What is your only comfort in life and in death?” The Catechism talks about the believer’s comfort in Christ, the guilt-grace-gratitude structure of Christian life, and the sacraments as a means of grace. It has been treasured for centuries across Reformed and Presbyterian churches.

Second Helvetic Confession (1566)

The Second Helvetic Confession was written by Heinrich Bullinger in 1566 in Zurich as a more comprehensive expression of Reformed theology. It was originally his private summary of faith but gained broad acceptance after being published during a period of political tension.

The Confession upholds Scripture as the ultimate authority, explains justification by faith alone, and emphasizes proper preaching and sacramental practice. Adopted by Reformed churches in Switzerland, Scotland, Hungary, and elsewhere, it became one of the most widely recognized confessional standards of the Reformed tradition.

Westminster Confession and Catechisms (1646–1647)

Produced by the Westminster Assembly of divines (i.e., leading theologians) in London during the English Civil War, the Westminster Confession of Faith (1646) and the Larger and Shorter Catechisms (1647) systematized Reformed theology with exceptional precision. Commissioned by the English Parliament, these documents affirmed the doctrines of Scripture’s sufficiency, God’s sovereignty, covenant theology, and salvation by grace.

The Larger Catechism was written for in-depth instruction, and the Shorter Catechism for teaching children and laypeople (“What is the chief end of man? To glorify God, and to enjoy Him forever”). They remain foundational to Presbyterian and many Reformed churches and it is arguably one of the most popular and influential Confessions to this day.

London Baptist Confession (1644; 1689)

The London Baptist Confession first appeared in 1644, written by Particular (Calvinistic) Baptists to distinguish themselves from radical Anabaptists and affirm their Reformed theology while emphasizing believer’s baptism.

The Second London Confession of 1689 expanded and revised the original, largely following the Westminster Confession but adapting it for Baptist distinctives such as congregational church government and baptism of professing believers only. It became the standard Confession for Reformed Baptists and is the key doctrinal document for many Baptist congregations worldwide.

Puritan Confession and Catechism (Mid-1600s)

The Puritan Confession and Catechism generally refers to confessional statements produced by Puritans seeking to reform the Church of England from within. The most notable is the Savoy Declaration of 1658, a Congregationalist adaptation of the Westminster Confession.

It maintained Reformed theology but emphasized local church autonomy (as opposed to the presbytery-style of church governance) with congregational governance. Puritan catechisms, such as those by John Owen and Richard Baxter, stressed holiness, Scripture-centered living, and covenant theology, reflecting the Puritan ideal of a reformed, godly society governed by biblical truth.

Episcopal Confession and Catechism (1563–1662)

The Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion (1563, finalized in 1571) serve as the Confession of Faith for the Anglican and Episcopal Churches. Rooted in the English Reformation under Elizabeth I, they maintain many Reformation doctrines—justification by faith, the sufficiency of Scripture, and rejection of certain Catholic practices—while retaining liturgical and episcopal traditions.

The Book of Common Prayer (1559, revised 1662) includes the Anglican Catechism, designed for instruction in the creeds, sacraments, and moral duties. Together, they represent a middle way (“via media”) between Protestant and Catholic theology.

Wesleyan Confession of Faith (1784)

John Wesley, founder of Methodism, adapted the Anglican Thirty-Nine Articles in 1784 to create the Articles of Religion of the Methodist Church. This Wesleyan Confession reflected his Arminian theology, emphasizing prevenient grace, human responsibility, and entire sanctification.

It rejected Calvinistic predestination while upholding salvation by grace through faith. The Methodist Catechism further taught the pursuit of holiness and love as central to Christian life. Wesley’s revisions shaped the Methodist and later Holiness (middle 1800s) and Pentecostal movements (early 1900s), embedding a theology of grace, sanctification, and social action.

Conclusion

Many churches today still adhere to these Confessions. But there are also many churches today that have left them behind and use their local Statement of Faith or a later Confession-type of document for their rule of faith (e.g., The Baptist Faith and Message for Southern Baptists today). I hope this gives you a taste of the importance of Confessions and why it was vital to have doctrines clearly stated and defended. 

□

Bodie Hodge, Ken Ham's son in law, has been an apologist since 1998 helping out in various churches and running an apologetics website. He spent 21 years working at Answers in Genesis as a speaker, writer, and researcher as well as a founding news anchor for Answers News. He was also head of the Oversight Council. 

Bodie launched Biblical Authority Ministries in 2015 as a personal website and it was organized officially in 2025 as a 501(c)(3). He has spoken on multiple continents and hosts of US states in churches, colleges, and universities. He is married with four children.

Whale Evolution?

Whale Evolution?

Bodie Hodge, M.Sc., B.Sc., PEI

Biblical Authority Ministries, November 11, 2025 (Donate)

Introduction

Whale evolution is almost taken as established fact in textbooks, museums, and media. It is a big deal because it is a mammal living, and brilliantly designed, for the deep oceans. Intriguingly, mammals almost exclusively live on land with minor exceptions like dolphins, porpoises, manatees, and whales. Whales, due to their size and popularity, are often the focal point for discussion over aquatic mammalian evolution.

Image requested by Bodie Hodge (ChatGPT)

The evolutionists must have whales evolve from land creatures because it is far too outrageous to have parallel evolution in ocean with mammalian features. In other words, the dumb luck of whales (and other mammals of the sea) evolving strictly from the aquatic ancestors and arriving at most of the same bodily features as mammalian land animals seems too much like a myth and fable that evolutionists even reject it out of hand.   

So, this brings us to the hot topic—how did whales get from the land to the sea? What evidence is there and how good is that evidence? 

Fossil Evidence

From the onset, the evolutionary account of whale origins is built on speculation rather than solid evidence. Simply put, the fossil record lacks genuine intermediates between land mammals and modern whales.

Instead of a clear, step-by-step lineage, a set of unrelated animals are interpreted to fit an evolutionary narrative. Textbooks often present a "convincing" series of transitional forms—such as Pakicetus, Ambulocetus, Rodhocetus, and Basilosaurus—but fail to reveal to readers that this lineup depends heavily on artistic reconstructions and assumptions about how these animals may have lived, their size, or that they are fully functioning creatures of entirely different kinds.

When the full fossil evidence is evaluated closely, these creatures do not demonstrate a smooth transformation from land to sea but instead show distinct, fully functional species with no verifiable genetic or developmental links between them. In laymen’s terms, think of it like this. If someone came up and said whales evolved and they put a rat, a dog, a horse, and then an hippo in front of you and told you they were the missing links for whales, would you believe them? No.

One of the central objections concerns the claim that whales evolved from land-dwelling hoofed mammals, possibly related to artiodactyls or even-toed ungulates (think of domestic animals like cow, sheep, camels and hogs or wild creatures like antelope, wildebeest, or pronghorns). There are major disagreements among evolutionists themselves about which group might be ancestral—earlier candidates such as mesonychids (large hoofed extinct mammals thought to be carnivorous) have been abandoned, and newer hypotheses are trying to link whales to hippos.

This shifting story is evidence of a weak idea built on arbitrary inference rather than observation. In other words, they don’t really know. From a creationist perspective, this is not a problem. We didn’t expect these creatures to be interrelated but distinct created kinds and a proper understanding of the evidence is a confirmation of what we expect in light of Scripture.

These supposed transitions require enormous structural and physiological innovations—such as modifications in locomotion, breathing, reproduction, and sensory systems—that cannot plausibly arise through small, undirected and random mutations preserved by natural selection. We simply didn’t observe any data of novel (technically, nascent) characteristic-forming, new functional features. Molecular data, anatomy, and fossil placement often conflict with the evolutionary story, making it incoherent.

Functional Complexity

The functional complexity of whale anatomy is a good reason to reject land-animal-to-whale evolution due to the whale’s specialized design features—its echolocation system, baleen feeding structures, tail flukes, blowhole, and specialized ear bones—would have to appear fully formed to work. A half-developed echolocation organ or blowhole would provide no survival benefit and thus could not be preserved through selection since the creature would die or be a serious detriment to their system.

Consider that the intricate “melon” organ used by dolphins for echolocation and the ability to dive to immense depths cannot be explained through small incremental changes. The absence of credible, fully functional intermediates means that whales and dolphins were created as such in their created kind (baramin), already equipped for aquatic life.

Therefore, it should be obvious to conclude that the whale’s unique features are products of functional design, not gradual evolution. This is not a problem for an all-powerful God who designed their fully functioning ancestors during Creation Week. Whales and other sea creatures were created specially by God on Day 5. 

Pakicetus

Another key point is that the fossil evidence does not align with the evolutionary story presented in textbooks. For instance, Pakicetus was originally described in the 1980s from a partial skull and interpreted as a semi-aquatic “walking whale.” However, later discoveries of more complete skeletons show that Pakicetus had long limbs, functional legs, and terrestrial ear bones—features consistent with a fully-featured, land-dwelling animal—not a missing link.

Image requested by Bodie Hodge (ChatGPT)

Its reclassification as a “proto-whale” was driven more by evolutionary religious fervor than by data.

Ambulocetus

Similarly, Ambulocetus—often depicted and assumed as an amphibious creature that could walk and swim—was known initially from fragmentary remains. Much of its reconstruction, including its supposed swimming style and diving behavior, rested on arbitrary artistic conjecture rather than fossil evidence.

Image requested by Bodie Hodge (ChatGPT)

After further finds, Ambulocetus looks more like an extinct land mammal than a genuine transition between land mammals and whales.

Rodhocetus

The fossil known as Rodhocetus also comes under scrutiny. Early artistic reconstructions gave Rodhocetus a whale-like fluke and tail based on evolutionary assumptions, yet later data found no fossil evidence for these features! It shows the evolutionary religious story’s influence on the artists.  

Image requested by Bodie Hodge (ChatGPT)

The pelvis and limb bones indicate some semi-aquatic ability, but nothing like the fully marine features seen in whales.

Basilosaurus

Basilosaurus, a large serpentine marine mammal, is another fossil frequently portrayed as an intermediate. However, Basilosaurus was fully aquatic, with small hind limbs likely used for reproduction or stabilization rather than walking (this is a common design feature today). It, therefore, cannot serve as a true link between land and sea mammals, since it is already a sea creature.

The dramatic differences in size among these supposed “transitional” species is also a huge problem. Pakicetus happens to be the size of a wolf and yet, the Basilosaurus is gigantic reaching about 65 feet (~20 meters) long. This is massive problem for such variation undermines the claim of a single lineage. Interestingly, each of these fossils in question all died the same year—being buried in the Flood of Noah. So from a biblical perspective, they are not ancestral in their forms, but coexisted and died in the same catastrophe. 

The 65 foot Basilosaurus; Image requested by Bodie Hodge (ChatGPT)

Biomechanics

In addition to fossil concerns, the plausibility of changing a land mammal into a fully aquatic whale is a biomechanical problem. Whales exhibit major differences in reproduction—giving birth underwater, nursing with specialized mammary glands, and having internalized genitals designed for streamlining.

Their respiratory systems must manage deep-diving pressure, oxygen storage, and voluntary breathing, none of which are present in land mammals. Their inner ears are encased in specialized dense bone (the involucrum) for underwater hearing, their tails move vertically instead of horizontally, and their spines and flippers are uniquely adapted for propulsion through water.

As a creationist, we contend that each of these features would require multiple simultaneous genetic and developmental changes, coordinated across entire body systems. Undirected random mutations and selection cannot achieve this level of integrated innovation. It’s simply a fairy tale.

A Philosophical Consideration

Any shared design features are better explained by a common Designer (Jesus Christ) who used similar structures for similar functions, not by evolutionary modification from a common ancestor. This shows the brilliance of an all-knowing God.

Consider the philosophical underpinnings of the evolutionary story. The evolutionist asserts that evolutionary scientists interpret evidence within a naturalistic framework that excludes the possibility of design or creation from the outset. This worldview bias causes scientists to interpret every new discovery in terms of common ancestry, even when the data are fragmentary or ambiguous.

Take note of the big picture. Evolution is assumed first, and the fossils are then interpreted through that lens. To make artist reconstructions based on evolution—which is then used as “proof” of evolution. The reality is that this a vicious circular argument and thus, fallacious.  

Where are the massive numbers of missing links? If this was occurring over millions of years, then where are all the intermediates? There should be millions of them! Instead, there are only a handful and very questionable creatures that simply don’t “fit the expected trend”.

The supposed “transitional” fossils appear suddenly in the record, without the numerous intermediate stages one would expect if slow transformation occurred. The absence of gradual change through geological layers makes more sense of rapid burial during catastrophic events, of the global Flood recorded in Genesis.

When fossils and biological systems are viewed through a biblical worldview (i.e., God is always right), these findings make much more sense. Whales, in this view, were created as fully formed marine mammals during the Creation Week, and their specialized design features reflect the Creator’s intent and foresight—even in a sin-cursed and broken world.

The evolutionary story of whale origins should be rejected on multiple grounds: the absence of clearly transitional fossils, the functional impossibility of half-formed systems, contradictions between fossil and molecular data, constant reclassification of supposed ancestors, and the enormous anatomical and physiological gaps that must be crossed.

Conclusion

Each fossil candidate in the chain—Pakicetus, Ambulocetus, Rodhocetus, Basilosaurus—is argued to be either fully terrestrial or fully aquatic, never truly intermediate. These animals were distinct kinds, not evolutionary stages, and that the whale’s complex design confirms an intelligent Creator God rather than undirected evolutionary processes.

The fossil series often touted as proof of whale evolution is artificially assembled from animals that are not chronologically connected. No direct ancestor-descendant relationships are demonstrable. Fossils are drawn from different locations and time periods (by the evolutionary story), then arranged to tell an evolutionary whale of a tale. 

□

Bodie Hodge, Ken Ham's son in law, has been an apologist since 1998 helping out in various churches and running an apologetics website. He spent 21 years working at Answers in Genesis as a speaker, writer, and researcher as well as a founding news anchor for Answers News. He was also head of the Oversight Council. 

Bodie launched Biblical Authority Ministries in 2015 as a personal website and it was organized officially in 2025 as a 501(c)(3). He has spoken on multiple continents and hosts of US states in churches, colleges, and universities. He is married with four children.