What Are The Kinds In Genesis?
An Introduction
Bodie Hodge, M.Sc., B.Sc., PEI (Donate)
Biblical Authority Ministries, May 28, 2025
Have you ever had a conversation with someone about the Ark
of Noah or creation and they clearly didn’t understand what a “kind” was? I’ve
ended up with a lot of these conversations, where I have to stop and explain.
I don’t say this in a critical way because I used to be like
that too! I used to struggle understanding what exactly a kind was. I was influenced
by the secular world, and had never been taught about kinds, but I was taught
extensively about species, genus, and family in the modern classification
system. This is likely the case with most people. Some today have been influenced
by evolutionary clades too.
So, I understand why some people simply have little to no knowledge about biblical kinds. But don’t look at it as a negative, but instead see this as an opportunity to gain a better understanding of animals and creation—and the cool biological research that is currently occurring regarding created kinds.
Kinds
The term “kinds” in the book of Genesis refers to the
original created categories of living and growing organisms (e.g., plants,
animals, and man) that God made during Creation Week (Genesis 1). For example,
consider (all verses NKJV):
· Genesis 1:11 Then God said, “Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb that yields seed, and the fruit tree that yields fruit according to its kind, whose seed is in itself, on the earth”; and it was so.
· Genesis 1:12 And the earth brought forth grass, the herb that yields seed according to its kind, and the tree that yields fruit, whose seed is in itself according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.
· Genesis 1:21 So God created great sea creatures and every living thing that moves, with which the waters abounded, according to their kind, and every winged bird according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.
· Genesis 1:24 Then God said, “Let the earth bring forth the living creature according to its kind: cattle and creeping thing and beast of the earth, each according to its kind”; and it was so.
· Genesis 1:25 And God made the beast of the earth according to its kind, cattle according to its kind, and everything that creeps on the earth according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.
A proper view of "kinds" is central to a good
understanding of biology, the fossil record, and the events surrounding Noah's
Ark. This is particularly important when studying the Flood.
Definition of "Kind"
A “kind” (Hebrew: min) is not equivalent to modern
taxonomic terms like species or genus. Instead, a “kind” is
generally broader—closer to the classification of a family or sometimes order—of
course, there are exceptions due to the fallibility of modern classification. Mankind,
for example, is not a broad range but closer to a species level (including the post-Flood
variations of homo sapiens sapiens and homo neanderthalensis[1])
and definitely not at the “family” level of classification!
- For
example, the canine kind includes domestic dogs, wolves, dingoes,
Peruvian hairless dogs, coyotes, jackals, and possibly foxes.
- The feline
kind includes lions, tigers, bobcats, leopards, and domestic cats.
- The equine
kind includes horses, donkeys, ponies, and zebras.
All animals within a kind descended from common ancestors
that God originally created. How many of those original ancestors were within that
kind at creation is unknown. With man, there were two (Adam and Eve for
mankind), but God likely had a multitude of animals within a kind at creation as
initial populations.
Nevertheless, the land animals that boarded the Ark
bottlenecked at the time of the Flood with 2 of each kind of unclean land-dwelling,
air-breathing animals and 7 of the clean land-dwelling, air-breathing animals. Thus,
this reset the population after the Flood for these land animals.
Baraminology
A relatively new field of science is called baraminology
(from Hebrew bara, “created,” and min, “kind” and -ology
which is, “the study of”), which seeks to identify and group organisms into
their original created kinds.
Baraminologists use a combination of criteria:
- Primary:
Hybridization ability (whether animals can interbreed or produce
offspring)
- Secondary:
Genetic similarities
- Secondary:
Morphological traits; that is a “Cognatum” level
- Secondary:
Discontinuities in the fossil record
If animals can interbreed, even indirectly (e.g., A breeds
with B, and B breeds with C, so A and C are part of the same kind), they are
the same kind. Thus, hybridization is the primary factor to determine kind
boundaries. Though some have lost the ability to reproduce due various factors
(think ovary issues, size, etc.)—this doesn’t make them any less members of a particular
created kind.
The secondary factors become more of a factor when dealing
with extinct, creatures that don’t live near one another, or those that have
lost the ability to breed back (due to defects, size, “heat” times, geography,
etc.). But these secondary factors still require interpretation.
Kinds On Noah’s Ark
A central reason it is necessary to understand kinds is to
defend the feasibility of the number of boarded animals on Noah’s Ark. Genesis
6:20-7:16 says that Noah took two of each kind (and seven of some). This means:
- Only representative
kinds, not our modern understanding of species, were brought
aboard.
- From
these original Ark kinds after the Flood, diversification and speciation
occurred rapidly after the Flood due to the splitting of the gene pool as
animals travelled to distinct places. This splitting and variation within
post-Flood environments are what resulted in today’s species.
Thus, instead of needing millions of modern “species” on the
Ark that had to go on two-by-two or by seven, it was less than 1,400 animal
kinds.[2]
Instead, the species of today are the descendants of those original animal
kinds that were aboard the Ark—minus the sacrificial ones of course (Noah sacrificed
of the clean animals per Genesis 8:20).
The point is that based on the kinds, the animals easily fit
on board the Ark with food and water. Even using intentionally inflated maximum
numbers—they easily fit.[3]
Changes, But Not Evolutionary Changes
Animals change. Everyone agrees on that. These changes are small
changes within kinds, such as variations in dogs or variations within cats. These
changes are often observable from one generation to the next. What we don’t
observe are large-scale changes that convert one kind into another kind (e.g.,
fish evolving into amphibians or dogs changing into cows).
- Change
within a kind is expected and observed.
- No new,
complex, functional genetic information is added—just reshuffling, nearly
neutral mutations, or losses of existing genetic material.
- No
kind has ever been observed to change into another kind.
For instance, wolves, coyotes, and dogs all descended from the same ancestral wolf-like kind that was on board the Ark and many of our modern dog breeds were bred just like that over the course of the last 200 years or so. This was done by artificial selection. But regardless of how much breeding of dogs, they will never change into mice. Fish never evolved into reptiles nor are dogs changing into cats or whales.
Here are a few examples of common critters you might
recognize and some selected members of that kind:
Common Name |
Kind |
Modern Examples |
Cat Kind |
Feline |
Lion, Tiger, Cougar, Bobcat, Housecat |
Dog Kind |
Canine |
Dog, Wolf, Dingo, Coyote |
Elephant Kind |
Proboscidea |
Asian, Mammoths, Mastodons, African Elephants |
Bear Kind |
Ursidae |
Polar Bear, Grizzly, Black Bear |
Horse Kind |
Equidae |
Horse, Donkey, Pony, Zebra |
Deer Kind |
Cervidae |
Deer, Elk, Moose |
Chicken Kind |
Phasianidae |
Pheasants, Japanese Bantum, Phoenix Chicken |
Plants and Insects
The term "kind" also applies to plants and
creeping things (Genesis 1:11-12, 24-25). However, less research has been done
on identifying these kinds. So, this is an area of future research for
creationists.
Like animals, plants and insects were created with abundance during
Creation Week. Therefore, there may have been great diversity within the
created plant kinds from the onset for instance.
To Summarize
The biblical term “kind” refers to the original, created
groups of animals and plants that God made during Creation Week. These are
usually broader than species—roughly on the level of family or sometimes order
in modern taxonomy.
Understanding kinds are greatly helpful when studying creation, the Ark, and the limits of biological change. Through baraminology, the hope is to catalog and identify these kinds and is an exciting area of research today.
[1]
Homo neanderthalensis used to be homo sapiens neanderthalensis (a subset of Homo
sapiens) before being reclassified; it shows the arbitrariness of some of this.
Nevertheless, Neanderthals wore clothes, buried their dead, made musical instruments
and tools just like man does. All the anatomical features of Neanderthals are within
the human population of today. So, they should be listed as man.
[2] Ken
Ham and Bodie Hodge, A Flood of Evidence, Master Books, Green Forest, AR, 2016, p. 209-218.
[3] Ken
Ham and Bodie Hodge, A Flood of Evidence, Master Books, Green Forest, AR, 2016, p. 209-218.