Monday, February 2, 2026

Presuppositions The Evidence Doesn’t Speak For Itself

Feedback on Presuppositions: The Evidence Doesn’t Speak For Itself

Bodie Hodge, M.Sc., B.Sc., PEI

Biblical Authority Ministries, February 2, 2026 (Donate)

Letter, unedited:

Evolution does not PRESUPPOSE no God. It merely attempts to discern the mechanisms of God’s universe. What you are saying is that you find it believable that God created a universe filled with evidence to teach us about how the world works. But that evidence shouldn’t be believed. Instead, we should believe a book written by primitive people with one foot still in a cave dwelling, rather than everything our God-given human abilities can see in God’s universe around us every day.

First of all, evolution is simply a collection of observations. If you prefer, you can see the hand of God in action within evolution. I do. I don’t see your problem.

S., USA

Response (in point-by-point style):

It is nice to hear from you and I’m glad that you are willing to make conversation about presuppositions and evolutionary thoughts. My comments below are said with sincerity and kindness.

Evolution does not PRESUPPOSE no God.

First of all, evolution doesn’t “think”, “presuppose”, or otherwise have human qualities—that is called the fallacy of reification. It is a worldview based on human thought. It would be better to say “evolutionists do not…”

Darwin rejected the God of the Bible and placed his faith in errant ideas of man; Image requested by Bodie Hodge (ChatGPT)

Strangely, Darwin, the father of the modern evolutionary models, disagrees with you in his book The Descent of Man. He makes it clear that man invented the concept of a God/spiritual realm. He even said:

“The same high mental faculties which first led man to believe in unseen spiritual agencies, then in fetishism, polytheism, and ultimately in monotheism, would infallibly lead him, as long as his reasoning powers remained poorly developed, to various strange superstitions and customs.”[1]

Also saying:

“The idea of a universal and beneficent Creator does not seem to arise in the mind of man, until he has been elevated by long-continued culture.”[2]

Claiming that man invented God makes this a godless philosophy from the start and clarifies what Darwin’s position was. It was essentially a rehash of Epicureanism [which was a Greek mythology that was evolutionary by nature with no God(s)] or the more recent version of Lamarckian evolution.

It merely attempts to discern the mechanisms of God’s universe.

Actually, that is what experimental science does (as opposed to historical science). Most fields of experimental science were developed by Bible-believing Christians, like us, to understand the laws of science God created.[3]

What you are saying is that you find it believable that God created a universe filled with evidence to teach us about how the world works. But that evidence shouldn’t be believed.

Not so. We believe the evidence. We all have the same evidence but it doesn’t speak for itself.[4] All evidence must be interpreted based on a belief system. As a Christian, I use the Bible to explain the evidence.

It would be illogical to think that God, who is perfect and who eye witnessed His creation, wouldn’t know how to explain it and that imperfect men who weren’t there would know more than God.

So when it comes to evidence, one’s faith needs to be in a perfect God or errantly in imperfect men to interpret it. I simply don’t have the “faith” in fallible men that some do.

Arguing against God and His Word never works out in the end; Image requested by Bodie Hodge (ChatGPT)

Instead, we should believe a book written by primitive people

Primitive? I don’t accept your presupposition that man was originally primitive. The Bible is the proper presupposition, and it makes Adam out to be very intelligent. Adam had perfect DNA (“very good” in Genesis 1:31) and God programmed him with perfect knowledge (not infinite knowledge) so as to communicate with him right from the start. For more on Adam’s characteristics please see here.[5]

Even looking into the past, there is evidence to confirm the biblical account that man has always been intelligent, not primitive, having ancient batteries, incredible ship building technology, and let’s not forget the pyramids![6]

with one foot still in a cave dwelling,

Again, I don’t accept your presupposition that man was primitive but as you probably know there are still people today living in caves and that doesn’t make them primitive—some have wifi and cable TV!

rather than everything our God-given human abilities can see in God’s universe around us every day.

I agree with the observations. In fact, Romans 1:20 makes it clear that God’s attributes can be seen in what is made so we are without excuse.

For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse (Romans 1:20, NASB).

In essence, it is enough to condemn, but not enough to save. We all still need Jesus Christ.

First of all, evolution is simply a collection of observations.

Then why haven’t we observed these:

  1. No one has been able to make life from nonlife (matter giving rise to life which is foundational to pond scum-to-people evolution).
  2. No one has been able to change a single-celled life-form like an ameba into a cow or goat, etc.
  3. No one has been able to observe and repeat the big bang (which is foundational to pond scum-to-people evolution).
  4. We haven’t observed the billions of information-gaining mutations required to build the DNA strand to give rise to new kinds of life-forms.
  5. Matter has never been observed to give rise to new information.

Evolution is clearly a worldview and more specifically it is a subset of the religion of Secular Humanism, in the same way creation is a subset of Christianity.

If you prefer, you can see the hand of God in action within evolution. I do.

You are confusing natural selection with evolution. Natural selection is good, observable science. In fact, natural selection was developed by Ed Blyth, a creationist, about 25 years before Darwin and is an excellent confirmation of God’s created kinds in Genesis.

Natural selection clearly shows dogs making dogs, cats making cats, weasels making weasels, etc. This is biblical. However, we don’t observe dogs giving rise to horses or mice giving rise to cats. Natural selection is not goo-to-you evolution.

I don’t see your problem.

Steve
USA

The issue is simple—you can either trust God’s Word or trust man’s ideas about the past. In whom will your faith be placed. God says:

And without faith it is impossible to please Him, for he who comes to God must believe that He is and that He is a rewarder of those who seek Him (Hebrews 11:6, NASB).

It is better to take refuge in the LORD Than to trust in man. (Psalm 118:8 NASB).

Our goal here isn’t to win or lose an argument, but to get people thinking, point people in the direction of Christ and His salvation and then disciple them as Jesus commanded in Matthew 28. I’m sure you’ve heard the “good news” of Jesus Christ before, but I’m not sure if you understand what this means.

The “good news” of being saved goes back to the “bad news” in Genesis. God originally created a perfect world (Genesis 1:31); there was no death and suffering (Genesis 1:29–30). Then man sinned against a perfect and holy God (Genesis 3).

God cursed the animals and the ground because of man and sentenced them to die (Genesis 3). It is due to man’s actions that sin and death entered the world. Now we are all sinners as a result and in need of a Savior (Romans 5:12).

When man sinned, God sacrificed animals (Genesis 3:21—coats of skins) to cover their sin because God commanded that sin is punishable by death (Genesis 2:17). This covering could only cover, not forgive and take away sins (Hebrews 9:22).

But God loved us enough to take that punishment upon Himself. He stepped into His creation as a perfect man (remaining fully God), Jesus Christ, to live and suffer and die a painful death—to be the final sacrifice to cover our sins for good and offer forgiveness (John 3:16).

For those who receive Jesus Christ, there will be salvation and a new heaven and new earth (Isaiah 65:17; Revelation 21:1). They will one day see a perfect world again with no pain and sorrow (Revelation 21:4)—the curse will be removed (Revelation 22:3). When you remove the reason for the gospel and replace it with goo-to-you evolution, it undermines the reason for Christ.

I want to encourage you to consider this. Kind regards in Christ,

Bodie

A sinner saved by greace

Bodie Hodge, Ken Ham's son in law, has been an apologist since 1998 helping out in various churches and running an apologetics website. He spent 21 years working at Answers in Genesis as a speaker, writer, and researcher as well as a founding news anchor for Answers News. He was also head of the Oversight Council.  

Bodie launched Biblical Authority Ministries in 2015 as a personal website and it was organized officially in 2025 as a 501(c)(3). He has spoken on multiple continents and hosts of US states in churches, colleges, and universities. He is married with four children.

Mr. Hodge earned a Bachelor and Master of Science degrees from Southern Illinois University at Carbondale (SIUC). Then he taught at SIUC for a couple of years as a Visiting Instructor teaching all levels of undergraduate engineering and running a materials lab and a CAD lab. He did research on advanced ceramic materials to develop a new method of production of titanium diboride with a grant from Lockheed Martin. He worked as a Test Engineer for Caterpillar, Inc., prior to entering full-time ministry.

His love of science was coupled with a love of history, philosophy, and theology. For about one year of his life, Bodie was editing and updating a theological, historical, and scientific dictionary/encyclopedia for AI use and training. Mr. Hodge has over 25 years of experience in writing, speaking and researching in these fields. Originally at Answers in Genesis; Edited; Republished by permission.

 



[1] Darwin, C., The Descent of Man,  Chapter 3, www.literature.org/authors/darwin-charles/the-descent-of-man/chapter-03.html

[2] Darwin, C., The Descent of Man,  Chapter 21, www.literature.org/authors/darwin-charles/the-descent-of-man/chapter-21.html

[3] Which scientists of the past believed in a Creator? Answers in Genesis website,  http://www.answersingenesis.org/Home/Area/bios/default.asp#pastsci.

[4] Creation: Where’s the “proof?”, Ken Ham, December 1, 1999, Answers in Genesis website, http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/cm/v22/n1/creation-proof.

[5] See also: http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/cm/v13/n4/adam and is by Ken Ham.

[6] See: Ancient Civilizations and Modern Man, David Criswell, March 1, 1995, http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/cm/v17/n2/ancient-civilizations, The large ships of antiquity, Larry Pierce, Answers in Genesis website, http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/cm/v22/n3/ships, The Pyramids of Ancient Egypt, David Down, September 1, 2004, http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/cm/v26/n4/pyramids-of-ancient-egypt. 

Could Adam Eat from Any Tree?

Could Adam Eat from Any Tree? Did God contradict Himself concerning what He said Adam could eat? Bodie Hodge, M.Sc., B.Sc., PEI Biblical...