Are We Hiding Other Views?
Bodie Hodge,
M.Sc., B.Sc., PEI
Biblical
Authority Ministries, February 23, 2026 (Donate)
This is an
old feedback response that was done when I worked for AiG. I hope you enjoy this
blast from the past.
Letter,
unedited:
Your
website discourages discussion of your views. For example, I had to search
through several links to find this feedback page. The name of your organization
is revealing. You appear to take the view that you probably already have all
the answers, which is hardly the case.
It
seems that AIG has little interest in the exchange of views, especially views
that don’t support AIG’s. Do you feel there is no need to discuss them? Do you
think you know or speak for God? If so, how arrogant!
I
have to state that your contention that the interpretation of the evidence for
evolution depends on one’s world view is laughable. In fact, what I see with
each and every claim is that AIG simply asserts that the evidence supports
their case when by any rational measure it clearly does not. Worldview does not
cancel gravity. For AIG it seems, dogma trumps all. I suggest that you simply
reject science and relax. That, at least, would be a morally defensible, if
misguided, position to take.
S.G.,
Canada
Response:
Thank you for
contacting the ministry. Please see my comments below and note the sincerity
with which they are said.
Your
website discourages discussion of your views. For example, I had to search
through several links to find this feedback page.
Discussion of
our views takes place all around the Internet and churches—on forums, blogs,
and other social networks. In fact, we often encourage our visitors to share
the articles they read.
So it is
unnecessary for discussions on this site. We address as many questions and
thoughts as we can, and then we encourage our supporters to carry those
discussions to other websites, as there are many more of them than there are of
us. This is not an attempt to dissuade discussion; it is understanding tis
website’s role and limitations.
The
name of your organization is revealing. You appear to take the view that you
probably already have all the answers, which is hardly the case.
This is
misrepresentation fallacy. The ministry hopes to direct people to the
foundation and authority on all matters: the Bible. But God, indeed, does have
all the answers, and we merely intend to ultimately point everyone to His Word
(the Bible) as the only source of Truth and answers.
It
seems that AIG has little interest in the exchange of views, especially views
that don’t support AIG’s. Do you feel there is no need to discuss them?
Since you apparently feel so strongly about exchange in views, we wonder if you have contacted schools and universities about an exchange in views—other than that of evolution, as it is very unlikely that they would agree to entertain any other view than evolution.
Note that the
ministry does not advocate the teaching of creation in
schools—especially by those not qualified, but we do wonder why the
evolutionary religion of humanism gets free reign in the classroom, whereas
other religions have been kicked out. And we do, in fact, discuss views
contrary to our own in a number of places. For example, we usually address a
challenge to our views such as this response, and we specifically quote a
number of anti-creation views in our other articles.
Do
you think you know or speak for God? If so, how arrogant!
Yes and no.
As Christians, of course, we know God (to the best of each of our abilities to
get into God’s Word), and have repented of our sins and received Christ as Lord
and Savior. As Christians, we have been instructed to be ready to give a reason
for the hope that is within us (1 Peter 3:15).
We can know
God because He knows us and indwells us and leads us in His Truth. We would
encourage you to get to know Him as well—at least consider the claims of Christ
with an open mind. We encourage you to also consider the straightforward
reading of Scripture, putting aside any interpretation that you’ve heard or
think.
Do we speak
for God? No. God speaks for Himself in His Word—the Bible. If we ever present a
view that is contradictory to Scripture, and then place it above the scriptural
view, then that would be not only arrogant, but blasphemy.
I
have to state that your contention that the interpretation of the evidence for
evolution depends on one’s world view is laughable.
How so? It is
sad that many really think that evolutionists do not interpret evidence in
light of their evolutionary worldview. When evolutionists dig up a dinosaur
bone, they don’t announce it was created on the 6th
day of creation!
In
fact, what I see with each and every claim is that AIG simply asserts that the
evidence supports their case when by any rational measure it clearly does not.
Such as?
Besides, I’ve heard creationists assert the same basic thing about
evolutionists: “In fact, what I see with each and every claim is that
evolutionists simply assert that the evidence supports their case when by any
rational measure it clearly does not.” Why would we point this out?
Because
evidence does not support or refute. It is inanimate. It is not a rationally
thinking being. Hence, this reveals the fallacy of reification—where people try
to give humanlike qualities to something that doesn’t have it. So we are back
to interpretations of evidence, based on one’s worldview.
Worldview
does not cancel gravity.
Of course
not, but only the Christian worldview can account for gravity’s existence. In
an evolutionary worldview, why would the laws of science be uniform if
everything exploded from nothing? So, to do science, the Bible must be true.
Additionally,
you’re misunderstanding what a worldview is and does. Gravity is a physical
constant that we can repeatedly test in the present. The present effects of
gravity are not up for debate. Instead, a worldview informs our beliefs about
the past, such as why there is the uniformity of gravity that we do observe.
An
evolutionist could give no reason why there is uniformity, but a Christian
would say that the universe behaves in a uniform fashion because it reflects
God’s nature and this uniformity makes science possible. Worldview differences
are not about observations of the present; they are about the unobservable past
and origins.
For
AIG, it seems, dogma trumps all.
False. God
and His
Word trumps all, as God is the ultimate authority. To challenge this is to
raise oneself up to be greater than God. This is essentially the religion of humanism.
But for the non-Christian, dogma trumps logic, science, and so on.
I
suggest that you simply reject science and relax.
Considering science
comes out of a Christian worldview, there is no need to reject science. Since
we’re being logical,
rational, and calm—resting in the peace of God and His Word (Philippians
4:7)—why would we need a suggestion to relax?
That,
at least, would be a morally defensible, if misguided, position to take.
To assume
that morality
exists, is to borrow from the truth of the Bible, as morality originates from
God. Considering morality comes from a Christian worldview, this statement is
also false and undermines the position taken in this email.
May we
suggest that you consider the
truth of God and His Word and begin with God being the authority—not me or
anyone at the ministry. The
issue is between you and God. Consider the God of the Bible, and consider His free gift of
salvation and restoration to man.
With kindness
in Christ,
Bodie Hodge, Ken Ham's son in law, has been an apologist since
1998 helping out in various churches and running an apologetics website. He
spent 21 years working at Answers in Genesis as a speaker,
writer, and researcher as well as a founding news anchor for Answers
News. He was also head of the Oversight Council.
Bodie launched Biblical Authority Ministries in
2015 as a personal website and it was organized officially in 2025 as a
501(c)(3). He has spoken on multiple continents and hosts of US states in
churches, colleges, and universities. He is married with four children.
Mr. Hodge earned a Bachelor and Master of Science degrees from Southern
Illinois University at Carbondale (SIUC). Then he taught at SIUC for a
couple of years as a Visiting Instructor teaching all levels of undergraduate
engineering and running a materials lab and a CAD lab. He did research on
advanced ceramic materials to develop a new method of production of titanium
diboride with a grant from Lockheed Martin. He worked as a Test Engineer
for Caterpillar, Inc., prior to entering full-time ministry.
His love of science was coupled with a love of history,
philosophy, and theology. For about one year of his life, Bodie was editing and
updating a theological, historical, and scientific dictionary/encyclopedia for
AI use and training. Mr. Hodge has over 25 years of experience in writing,
speaking and researching in these fields. Originally at Answers in
Genesis; Edited; Republished by permission.
